| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
IBM's summary judgment motionIBM's summary judgment motionPosted Aug 17, 2004 18:08 UTC (Tue) by dajobe (guest, #6420)Parent article: IBM's summary judgment motion
Typo? "It brings up the old issue of $ echo describing ATT's intent"
(Log in to post comments)
$echo Posted Aug 17, 2004 18:14 UTC (Tue) by corbet (editor, #1) [Link] Nope, not a typo. $ echo was an ATT publication for its Unix licensees; one old issue clarified ATT's intent with regard to derived works and such. See this Groklaw article for details. I should have put that into the article directly, sorry.
typo Posted Aug 17, 2004 20:24 UTC (Tue) by Tcler (subscriber, #5919) [Link] $ echo wasn't a typo, but there is one in your quoting of paragraph 90(excerpt from Mr. DeFazio's deposition). s/developer by/developed by/
|
|
||||||||||||