| |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
UserLinux plans anouncedUserLinux plans anouncedPosted Aug 4, 2004 17:03 UTC (Wed) by cpeterso (guest, #305)Parent article: UserLinux plans anounced
I am pretty excited about UserLinux's prospects, especially as a focused, user-oriented version of Debian. I think Bruce has the user focus, experience, and community clout to (probably) pull this off. I was worried when UserLinux went quiet for so long. I hope some of UserLinux's influence flows upstream back to the Debian gearheads. ;-)
(Log in to post comments)
Go Debian! Posted Aug 4, 2004 17:28 UTC (Wed) by stuart (subscriber, #623) [Link] I'd really like to see Red Hat drop Fedora and instead use Debian as their base too. Likelihood of this happenning: zero.
Oh well.
Go Debian! Posted Aug 4, 2004 23:58 UTC (Wed) by darthmdh (guest, #8032) [Link] But then they wouldn't be compatible with the Redhat Linux Standard Base and we'd be back to square one in that regard.
the LSB should have been Debian based from the get-go instead of wasting all this time and effort on inferior proprietary solutions.
Go Debian! Posted Aug 5, 2004 7:47 UTC (Thu) by micampe (guest, #4384) [Link] I'd really like to see Red Hat drop Fedora and instead use Debian as their base too. Likelihood of this happenning: zero.Thank God.
Go Debian! Posted Aug 5, 2004 14:58 UTC (Thu) by philips (guest, #937) [Link] You need to use Debian to get its beaty.
RHL/SuSE/Mandrake they are all sort of brain-damaged with differentiation and branding. And it
Debian managed to stay sort of neutral with its dpkg & apt. When some-one say "it runs on
Two words: Community Project.
UserLinux plans anounced Posted Aug 4, 2004 21:19 UTC (Wed) by davidw (subscriber, #947) [Link] The idea is that UL will indeed be as closely linked to Debian as possible.
In general I like the idea too. I have a few doubts as to what will be done about the release schedule if Debian's doesn't improve a bit, but I think Bruce is definitely someone who can deliver if he puts his mind to it.
|
|||||||||||