| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Choosing an open source license (NewsForge)Choosing an open source license (NewsForge)Posted Jul 27, 2004 7:54 UTC (Tue) by MathFox (guest, #6104)In reply to: Choosing an open source license (NewsForge) by JoeBuck Parent article: Choosing an open source license (NewsForge) I just read the article and it looks like the writer of the article doesn't understand the basic legal issues involved in licensing. Don't blame Larry for this shoddy interview.
(Log in to post comments)
Choosing an open source license (NewsForge) Posted Jul 27, 2004 10:24 UTC (Tue) by kornak (guest, #17589) [Link] I'm just tired of seeing that term repeated over and over again. It's oneof those cases where if people hear it enough they might start believing it. The term has already become a part of the common vernacular. I refuse to use it as it serves no purpose to repeat Micro-speak. I will not use MS jargon to describe the GPL since it has an insidious, subliminally negative impact on the language.
Choosing an open source license (NewsForge) Posted Jul 27, 2004 16:27 UTC (Tue) by JoeBuck (subscriber, #2330) [Link] No, I do blame Larry, because I have read articles by him where he advocates his theories, and I have read the license texts that he wrote. His advice is a disservice to the open source/free software community.
|
|
||||||||||||