| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
OLS: Enforcing the GPLOLS: Enforcing the GPLPosted Jul 26, 2004 18:53 UTC (Mon) by dvdeug (subscriber, #10998)In reply to: OLS: Enforcing the GPL by stock Parent article: OLS: Enforcing the GPL Darl McBride is making vague claims over software he didn't create, and suing over it. We're making specific claims over software we did create; we are in the right to be doing this.
(Log in to post comments)
OLS: Enforcing the GPL Posted Jul 28, 2004 4:10 UTC (Wed) by stock (guest, #5849) [Link] Darl McBride is making vague claims over software he didn't create, and suing over it. We're making specific claims over software we did create; we are in the right to be doing this.I use Darl McBride as role model example here. Everyone in the Linux/FOSS camp hates this guy. Don't become the most hated GPL law-enforcer in a total insane GPL software abuse witch-hunt, is what i ment to say. It will earn you some cash (remains to be seen) but be carefull not to earn global hatred too. Don't send your seize and desist GPL-enforcement letter to any software company which you know to exist. Only come in action when known _proof_ of GPL abuse does exist. Robert
OLS: Enforcing the GPL Posted Jul 28, 2004 7:50 UTC (Wed) by piman (subscriber, #8957) [Link] No one is doing that. All the cases pursued are clear violations of the GPL. Money be damned, I want free code.
|
|
||||||||||||