| |||||||||||
Constructive flame.Constructive flame.Posted Jul 5, 2004 14:39 UTC (Mon) by mjr (subscriber, #6979)In reply to: Flame by angdraug Parent article: Debian postpones social contract changes
The latter would mean either creating a fork, or at least enforcing SC in the packages you maintain and submitting patches to other packages. Indeed; as a non-DD I'd urge any malcontents to be constructive and act according to the latter option. I doubt that DFSG compliance patches would be frowned upon. I'm only maintaining a single package of my own software, but I know I'd fix it regardless of this vote if it had something non-DSFG-free in it.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||