| Weekly edition | Kernel | Security | Distributions | Search |
| Archives | Calendar | Subscribe | Write for LWN | LWN.net FAQ |
Not very good
Not very good
Posted Jun 29, 2004 23:06 UTC (Tue) by emk (subscriber, #1128)Parent article: Looking for Indemnification While Linux Sales Double (O'ReillyNet)
The author has a poor grasp of OSRM's products, and the issues involved in the SCO case. There's also a pretty unrealistic view of the indemnification actually provided by commercial vendors, which is usually very minimalistic when present at all.
Odd.
(Log in to post comments)
Indemnification policy review
Posted Jun 30, 2004 10:03 UTC (Wed) by Duncan (guest, #6647) [Link]
I'd agree w/ your evaluation of the OSRM products, but not so much withthe vendor stuff. Granted, the vendor stuff does tend to be rather
limited, but the article /does/ tend to point that out, as well. The
exception might be Novell, which the author seems quite favorable toward,
but which I've seen little coverage of their indemnification policy, other
than this. See my (soon) reply to the other post for additional thoughts.
Duncan