| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
GPG supportGPG supportPosted Jun 29, 2004 22:15 UTC (Tue) by corbet (editor, #1)In reply to: GPG support by pjhacnau Parent article: The Grumpy Editor's guide to graphical mail clients GPG support is pretty much a given anymore with these clients. I would like to have talked about that a bit more, but this article was getting overly long as it was... Vanilla Sylpheed could use a little work (which Sylpheed-claws provides); the others pretty much handle it at this point.
(Log in to post comments)
GPG support Posted Jul 5, 2004 19:00 UTC (Mon) by mmutz (subscriber, #5642) [Link] > GPG support is pretty much a given anymore with these clients.> [...] the others pretty much handle it at this point. I tend to disagree. There are vast differences in usability. I, for one (being not entirely unbiased, of course), couldn't live without KMail's "Automatically encrypt messages whenever possible" a.k.a. opportunistic encryption.
|
|
||||||||||||