| |||||||||||||
IMAPIMAPPosted Jun 29, 2004 22:13 UTC (Tue) by ccyoung (guest, #16340)In reply to: The Grumpy Editor's guide to graphical mail clients by dlang Parent article: The Grumpy Editor's guide to graphical mail clients Maybe you'd be interested in Cone and Courier IMAP
(Log in to post comments)
IMAP Posted Jun 30, 2004 3:49 UTC (Wed) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313) [Link] when given a choice I use Cyrus for the IMAP server not Courier, but that's not the issue here :-)is cone a mail client? if so can you give more info on it?
Cone Posted Jul 1, 2004 17:54 UTC (Thu) by bjn (guest, #2179) [Link] Cone is Sam Varshavchik's Pine-a-like, a good match for Courier environments since it comesfrom the same project.
IMAP Posted Jul 1, 2004 17:51 UTC (Thu) by bjn (guest, #2179) [Link] Along the lines of dlang's comment, here we started with UW-IMAP until it couldn't handle theload, and then switched to Courier IMAP until it couldn't handle the load either, and are now switching to Cyrus. So you can perhaps skip a step. :-)
Cyrus IMAPd Posted Jul 9, 2004 9:56 UTC (Fri) by ringerc (subscriber, #3071) [Link] As others have noted, it might be easier and nicer to skip to Cyrus IMAPdif you're changing mail servers. It's extremely fast even for full-text mailbox searches ("man squatter" for fulltext indexes used on server-side SEARCH commands) and very stable. It's also in steady development, and quite remarkably flexible. You'll have a hard time getting your head around the authentication configuration at first, but it's not really that bad and it's well and truly worth it for such an amazing mail server. If I had to go back to using an ISP's mail services instead of runing my own mail server, I'd just fetchmail to a local Cyrus - I'm spoilt by it now ;-)
|
|||||||||||||