| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
GPG supportGPG supportPosted Jun 29, 2004 22:10 UTC (Tue) by pjhacnau (subscriber, #4223)Parent article: The Grumpy Editor's guide to graphical mail clients
You only mention this in passing for Sylpheed, and not at all for the others.
(Log in to post comments)
GPG support Posted Jun 29, 2004 22:15 UTC (Tue) by corbet (editor, #1) [Link] GPG support is pretty much a given anymore with these clients. I would like to have talked about that a bit more, but this article was getting overly long as it was... Vanilla Sylpheed could use a little work (which Sylpheed-claws provides); the others pretty much handle it at this point.
GPG support Posted Jul 5, 2004 19:00 UTC (Mon) by mmutz (subscriber, #5642) [Link] > GPG support is pretty much a given anymore with these clients.> [...] the others pretty much handle it at this point. I tend to disagree. There are vast differences in usability. I, for one (being not entirely unbiased, of course), couldn't live without KMail's "Automatically encrypt messages whenever possible" a.k.a. opportunistic encryption.
|
|
||||||||||||