| |||||||||||
Distribs switched to xorg (gentoo)Distribs switched to xorg (gentoo)Posted Jun 29, 2004 8:04 UTC (Tue) by evgeny (subscriber, #774)In reply to: Distribs switched to xorg (gentoo) by Duncan Parent article: A look at Slackware 10.0 > BTW & FWIW, Gentoo uses a requires/depends type init setup as well. As well as _what_? To the best of my knowledge (which, admittedly, somewhat dated), Slackware doesn't have any kind of dependencies in the init stuff. Did it appear in 10.0?
(Log in to post comments)
Distribs switched to xorg (gentoo) Posted Jun 29, 2004 8:51 UTC (Tue) by tzafrir (subscriber, #11501) [Link] As well as LSB 1.3http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/refspecs/LSB_1.3.0/gLSB/gLSB/initscrcomconv.html Is there any distro outside UnitedLinux that implements this?
Distribs switched to xorg (gentoo) Posted Jul 1, 2004 4:54 UTC (Thu) by set (guest, #4788) [Link] Probably a reference to Net/FreeBSD's init system, which is similar,but not the same.
Requires/depends init scripts vs "BSD-style" vs "Sys-V style" Posted Jul 1, 2004 8:18 UTC (Thu) by Duncan (guest, #6647) [Link] >> BTW & FWIW, Gentoo uses a requires/depends>> type init setup as well. > As well as _what_? You didn't read the comment threads to well, did you? I was referring to the thread entitled '"BSD-style" init scripts,', started by "Donio". The comment was made (the truth of which I don't know, as I prefer contributing where improvements to my code get likewise contributed, thus, Linux, not BSD) that even most BSDs no longer use "BSD-style" init scripts, but rather requires/depends type scripts. I was simply stating that rather than the traditional Sys-V style init scripts most distribs use, Gentoo also uses requires/depends style init scripts. Just as the Gentoo ports system came from the BSDs, so, I believe, did the requires/depends, tho I'm not sure of it. Duncan
Requires/depends init scripts vs "BSD-style" vs "Sys-V style" Posted Jul 1, 2004 8:30 UTC (Thu) by evgeny (subscriber, #774) [Link] >>> BTW & FWIW, Gentoo uses a requires/depends>>> type init setup as well. >> As well as _what_? > You didn't read the comment threads to well, did you? I was referring to So why didn't you reply to _that_ thread?! If you're referring to _another_ thread, make this clear. Don't assume everyone else has as perverted logic in understanding what you're talking about. Your comment was off topic both of the current thread and the original article (which focused on Slackware, not current *BSD).
|
|||||||||||