| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
HP expands open-source support (News.com)HP expands open-source support (News.com)Posted Jun 1, 2004 19:59 UTC (Tue) by burki99 (subscriber, #17149)In reply to: HP expands open-source support (News.com) by leandro Parent article: HP expands open-source support (News.com) >> I, for one have found Mysql to meet many of the needs of a database > At a greater complexity, lower performance, lesser standards compliance than PostgreSQL, requiring more coding. that might be true - but as long Mysql is "good enough", "Worse is Better" (http://www.jwz.org/doc/worse-is-better.html) at least for me and probably for many other people out there - no matter how often we get to hear that PostgreSQL is supposedly "better" (whatever "better" exactly means - ease of installation on my windows notebooks is something i value, even if i deploy under linux).
(Log in to post comments)
HP expands open-source support (News.com) Posted Jun 1, 2004 23:30 UTC (Tue) by jae (guest, #2369) [Link] $ apt-get install postgresql $ apt-get install mysql Spot the difference.
HP expands open-source support (News.com) Posted Jun 2, 2004 18:17 UTC (Wed) by leandro (subscriber, #1460) [Link] > "Worse is Better" (http://www.jwz.org/doc/worse-is-better.html) at least for me Uh... the point of that (classic) article is that Lisp is better and should be used, but that its marketing could use some improvement in order to overcome inertia.
|
|
||||||||||||