Re: [RFD] Explicitly documenting patch submission
[Posted May 25, 2004 by corbet]
| From: |
| "Francis J. A. Pinteric" <linuxdoctor-AT-linuxdoctor.biz> |
| To: |
| kernel <linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org> |
| Subject: |
| Re: [RFD] Explicitly documenting patch submission |
| Date: |
| Mon, 24 May 2004 20:41:55 -0400 |
On Mon, 24 May 2004 13:45:33 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:
>
> In other words: this is not about changing the way we work. It's about
> documenting the things we take for granted. So that outsiders can be
> shown how it works.
>
Personally, I'd like to see this evolve into something along the lines
of ISO-9000. If linux development can have the ability to create
detailed audit trails of code changes there would never be a question
about who contributed what and who owns it.
It would be nice if some sort of ISO-9000 compliance were a long term
goal here. The proprietary software houses would go nuts.
>>>---fja->
--
If you think what I'm saying is "politically incorrect",
you've got the wrong politics.
Tired of `netiquette'? Fed up with endless discussion of
what is '[OT]'? Linux, Free/Open Source discussion without
the "political correctness:" http://linuxdoctor.dyndns.org/list.html
(
Log in to post comments)