| |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
Linus on documenting patch provenanceLinus on documenting patch provenancePosted May 23, 2004 16:25 UTC (Sun) by stuart (subscriber, #623)Parent article: Linus on documenting patch provenance Yes this does smell a bit of "maybe GNU has a point" doesn't it but good for Linus for acknowledging that a problem exists and taking the first steps to fixing it. Stu.
(Log in to post comments)
Linus on documenting patch provenance Posted May 23, 2004 22:11 UTC (Sun) by khim (subscriber, #9252) [Link] The strange thing is that it's not about "GNU has a point" (of course GNU does but it's other story). It's about who to ask abots this or that change when something goes wrong (I do not mean legally).
Linus on documenting patch provenance Posted May 24, 2004 13:41 UTC (Mon) by stuart (subscriber, #623) [Link] and there was me thinking it was everything to do with the legal issues...that'd be why Linus referred to SCO in his email wouldn't it?Stu.
|
|||||||||||