Does Windows implement a microkernel design?
Posted May 20, 2004 20:30 UTC (Thu) by
nicku (subscriber, #777)
In reply to:
Is Torvalds really the father of Linux? (News.com) by fjf33
Parent article:
Is Torvalds really the father of Linux? (News.com)
The Windows kernel is very large; it does not meet the description of being a "tiny microkernel like MINIX". Here Andrew says:
With all the security problems Windows has now, it is increasingly obvious to everyone that tiny microkernels, like that of MINIX, are a better base for operating systems than huge monolithic systems.
Notice that he is
contrasting Windows with a microkernel design. The successful (but specialised) example that Andy points to is QNX, which is truly small. Although Microsoft describe their operating system as a microkernel design, a huge amount of code runs at high privelege level, which really negates the aim of simplicity that a microkernel design aspires to.
VMS is definitely a greater influence on Windows NT and it successors than MINIX.
(
Log in to post comments)