GNOME has lost its way [LWN.net]

GNOME has lost its way

Posted May 19, 2004 14:29 UTC (Wed) by Arker (guest, #14205)
In reply to: GNOME has lost its way by coulamac
Parent article: The Spatial Way

It is still easy to change window managers. At the command line, type killall metacity; [type the name of your window manager here];

In what sense is this an improvement over the days when you could go to the gnome configuration applet and choose from a list of detected, gnome-compatible window managers and push a button to switch?

It's definately inferior in several ways. First, while I'm fine with using command-lines, the whole point of GNOME was, I thought, to bring the power of the system to people that need GUIs, no? To go from the old way to the new one here makes it seem like the goal is rather to take the power away from people that need GUIs. This is a change that *discourages* the average user from excercising their freedom, by making it accessible only via an interface that is relatively obscure to them.

Secondly, of course, with the kill and start method you have to repeat those steps each session. With the old configuration option you could set your preference once and it would be saved for you. Which path here is more productive, and more friendly and respectful of the end-user?

Once again, the change doesn't make sense if you assume the architect who made it actually wants to give the user freedom and power - only if you rather assume the architect, like in the proprietary world, thinks he knows best and the user should be discouraged from making his own choices, if they can't be forbidden entirely. This is a very inappropriate stance for any Free Software project, IMOP.

However, I disagree about how GNOME had "simplicity" in the 1.4 days. GNOME 2.x has worked actively to provide a simpler interface. Most complaints involve this trend toward simplicity. So, how was GNOME simpler before?

It has become in many ways simpler, yes, but what was simpler before and now more complicated and difficult was to customise it to your liking. I remember firing up a fresh installation, starting X with Gnome installed as the default, going to the configuration and with a few clicks telling it I preferred to use WindowMaker instead of the then default which was Sawmill/Sawfish. The screen flickered for a few seconds and I had Gnome running with WindowMaker. When I restarted, it was still Gnome with WindowMaker. When I wanted to experiment with IceWM for a bit, a few clicks made the change, and it stayed changed until I wanted to change it back. When I decided I'd rather not have GMC startup, again there was an easy to find GUI interface to make this wish known, and it was respected - GMC quit loading on startup. It's now far more complicated to get Gnome to accept and honour such wishes, so in that way it's certainly fair to say it was simpler before.

(Log in to post comments)

GNOME has lost its way

Posted May 19, 2004 16:41 UTC (Wed) by rgmoore (✭ supporter ✭, #75) [Link]

First, while I'm fine with using command-lines, the whole point of GNOME was, I thought, to bring the power of the system to people that need GUIs, no? To go from the old way to the new one here makes it seem like the goal is rather to take the power away from people that need GUIs. This is a change that *discourages* the average user from excercising their freedom, by making it accessible only via an interface that is relatively obscure to them.

I think that your complaint is misguided. Providing a GUI option to swap window managers is likely to be either worthless or confusing to a typical newbie. They'll either ignore it because they don't understand what a window manager is and why they'd want to change, or they'll try using it anyway and be befuddled by the way that various aspects of their user experience change in subtle and non-obvious ways. By the time that a user knows enough about X to want to change his window manager, he should also know enough that a simple command line like "killall metacity && sawfish &" shouldn't be a big problem.

GNOME has lost its way

Posted May 19, 2004 16:59 UTC (Wed) by uravanbob (subscriber, #4050) [Link]

So you're saying that since I've been using Unix(tm)en since 1983 I should use the command line for everything, most especially things I don't do very often?

The complaint to the GNOME developers is that in their apparent goal to simplify things for newbies, they've critically and unnecessarily broken things that used to work just great for the rest of us. My personal favorite example is the desktop switching - metacity sucks but it isn't worth my time to keep fighting it.

If only Enlightenment 17 would land... :-)

GNOME has lost its way

Posted May 19, 2004 20:32 UTC (Wed) by smoogen (subscriber, #97) [Link]

The 'rest of us' are a shrinking minority.. people who want to look under the hood are going to be less and less as computers become more comodities.

Most of these complaints sound like my grandfathers complaining that automatics were ruining the car, that you couldnt work on an engine anymore because of all the fuel-saving/air-cleaning crap.. of course my grandfather told me he used to hear the same thing from his grandfather about horse and buggies being replaced by cars.

In the end, we all sound like the loons in the park yelling because the world changed and we didnt.

GNOME has lost its way

Posted May 20, 2004 19:11 UTC (Thu) by cdmiller (subscriber, #2813) [Link]

The target market you define for Gnome is not the folks posting comments here.

GNOME has lost its way

Posted May 20, 2004 19:44 UTC (Thu) by raytd (guest, #4823) [Link]

The 'rest of us' are a shrinking minority.. people who want to look under the hood are going to be less and less as computers become more comodities.

I beg to differ. F/OSS will eventually become ubiquitous providing the resources to countless numbers of new developers that wish to 'look under the hood'. I haven't counted lately, but either there are a lot more F/OSS developers or they've all just recently setup project homepages.

I do think that the people like your grandfather (soon to be you and I) either became overwhelmed by the change or became mechanics. (FWIW, I agree with him on the point of automatics.)