| |||||||||||||
Fighting software patents: a report from BrusselsFighting software patents: a report from BrusselsPosted May 6, 2004 16:26 UTC (Thu) by rjw (guest, #10415)In reply to: Fighting software patents: a report from Brussels by rwmj Parent article: Fighting software patents: a report from Brussels
Good advice, I've already made clear in correspondence to my MEPs that I won't be voting for the software patent shills that are the Labour party. But it doesn't address the point that in the EU, the parliament has absolutely no power to do anything but what the Commission lets it, so it makes no difference who is in power in the parliament. If they don't broadly do what they are told, the Commission will just veto every single thing they do.
(Log in to post comments)
Fighting software patents: a report from Brussels Posted May 6, 2004 20:03 UTC (Thu) by erwbgy (subscriber, #4104) [Link] I expressed this very concern to Bill Newton Dunn (UK LibDem MEP) and heresponded with: "In 2nd reading, the parliament can if it so votes, put its previously passed amendments back in again. This is the normal process of legislating between two houses of a parliament - as in the US Congress where both houses have to agree - but not as in London where one house has more power than the other (and therefore there is an inadequate democratic check on the powerful house). If after two readings each by both parliament and Council, there is no agreement on the final amendments to the text, there is a "Conciliation" negotiation between the two bodies, and then both bodies vote separately on the negotiated text. If both vote to accept that final text, then that is the text of the law. If they cannot agree, or if one house rejects the negotiated text, then the whole law lapses." So, some MEPs have a clue and it seems that it is possible for us to succeed by convincing parliament alone.
Fighting software patents: a report from Brussels Posted May 6, 2004 23:03 UTC (Thu) by rjw (guest, #10415) [Link] Thats very good to know. But....If that happens, then the individual states will come under tremendous pressure from the US State Department, IBM, Nokia, etc etc to "harmonise". Given that the UK PTO is the driving force for this change, if it doesn't happen on an EU level, they'll be screwing up my dayjob anyway. But if some large economies stay out of the mess, hopefully all out patent crackdown can be avoided. I'm not feeling hopeful though.
|
|||||||||||||