Advertisement Advanced thin client solution for Linux, based on Open Source. Mix Windows and Linux applications on the same desktop. V
|
10 times better?10 times better?Posted Apr 29, 2004 15:13 UTC (Thu) by rwmj (subscriber, #5474)Parent article: The 2004 Desktop Linux Summit There's a good of thumb used in marketing which is that if you want to displace an entrenched competitor with a lock on the market, your new product had better be at least 10 times better[1]. Is Linux 10 times better than Windows? I like to think it's better, but it's certainly not 10 times better, however you might define that (eg. 10 times more productive? - not a chance). Given that Linux isn't 10 times better, and I'd say it's also not likely to become 10 times better either, there are two other things that could happen: (1) The disruptive technology: People stop using PCs and laptops and start using some other type of computing service. Web services anyone? (2) Microsoft makes a catastrophic mistake. Microsoft rarely makes mistakes. My point, I suppose, is that either Linux has got to become a lot better in short order, or else people shouldn't concentrate on capturing the desktop, but should look for making that disruptive change happen instead. Rich. [1] See rule #56 here: http://www.klhess.com/bootstrap/less_stra.htm amongst other places.
(Log in to post comments)
10 times better? Posted May 10, 2004 8:56 UTC (Mon) by jneves (subscriber, #2859) [Link] If it's not, it's getting there. For most managers maintenance costs are increasing and productivity is going down thanks to (mostly) Outlook design. The difference is becoming quite noticeable.
|
Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds
Powered by Rackspace Managed Hosting.