Lindows goes for an IPO - a detailed look
Lindows proposes to sell $57.5 million worth of shares in its initial offering. The company will be using WR Hambrecht's "OpenIPO" process, which seeks to price the stock at the highest level the market will bear via an auction process. Other companies which have used this method include Salon and Andover.Net (which is now OSDN and part of VA Software).
So what is Lindows? From the filing:
The company states that, as computers get cheaper, the cost of Windows becomes more predominant, especially for desktop systems. Price pressures, they say, will cause manufacturers and consumers to look more seriously at Linux. And Lindows, of course, hopes to have the version of Linux which is best suited to this market.
A big part of the Lindows plan is to get its distribution installed widely in a short period of time. The company is targeting small computer manufacturers, offering them a "low cost" licensing program. There is also a deal with Seagate, which is pre-installing Linspire on some of its drives. Remember, ten years ago, how you could buy disks with Linux preinstalled? That market is back, it would seem.
How does Lindows plan to use the money?
In other words, the day Lindows goes public will be a good day for Michael Robertson. Lindows says it may also use some of the money for acquisitions.
Lindows has to disclose its financial state as part of this offering, of course. The company, it turns out, brought in all of $63,131 in 2002, but that jumped up to just over $2 million in 2003. Even so, Lindows managed to lose over $4 million that year. As of the end of 2003, the company had $250,000 in the bank, a "working capital" figure of $-1.8 million, and $4.7 million in debt. How that figure squares with the $10 million owed to Mr. Robertson (and earning 10% interest) is not entirely clear.
From the obligatory "scary risk factors" section:
- They just might run into some financial problems when trying to
compete directly with Microsoft for desktop sales.
- "
We have not demonstrated the success of our open source software business model, which gives our customers the right to freely copy and distribute some of the software in our operating system and in the applications we develop and distribute. There is uncertainty in connection with open source business models, particularly as to whether or not businesses based on open source software can operate profitably.
" - Customers may not go for a model based on service and license fees.
- Their Japanese distributions are handled by Livedoor, which, having
just acquired Turbolinux, may lose interest in Lindows. Livedoor was
responsible for 11% of the company's 2003 revenue.
- Third-party applications for Linux may not be forthcoming.
- "
We have received an audit report from our independent auditors containing an explanatory paragraph stating that our historical losses and negative cash flows from operations raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
" - The trademark fight with Microsoft could yet sink them. They are also, it appears, in a court battle with their insurance carrier over whether the costs of the Microsoft litigation are covered.
Lindows claims a little over 250,000 installed systems. How do they know?
Among other things, Lindows learns who sold you the system when the "light up" occurs. These end-user systems generated some 1.7 million in revenue in 2003.
The company has spent some $1.4 million in legal fights with Microsoft. It has extracted most of that back from its insurance carrier through lawsuits, but that case is still outstanding. If things go badly, Lindows may have to repay the insurance carrier, which would hurt. There are still outstanding Microsoft suits in Spain, Canada, and France, and a fight in South Africa would appear to be in the works. Lindows has also sued Xandros, as it turns out. It would appear that Lindows loaned Xandros $750,000 which has not been repaid.
As of the end of March, Lindows has 62 employees, 38 of whom are software engineers. The CEO is Michael Robertson, of course, who, under a new agreement, is to be paid $410,000 per year, plus bonuses. Mr. Robertson owns something over 48 million shares of the company - 81% of the total. The number of shares to be sold in the IPO has not yet been specified, but it seems clear that Mr. Robertson will remain in possession of a majority of the outstanding shares. The next biggest holder is the "Burcham Community Property Trust," which is controlled by the parents of Mr. Robertson's wife. Kevin Carmony, the company's president, holds 3 million shares.
The aggregate message from this filing is clear: Lindows is trying to go
public now because it very much needs the money. The company has large
debts, a series of ongoing legal battles, and a need for money to carry its
business plan forward. If the IPO fails, Lindows will have to come up with
another source of funds in a hurry, or, as its accountants warn, its
"ability to continue as a going concern" will be very much in doubt.
Someday there will be a thriving market around
desktop Linux, and Lindows may, indeed, be well positioned to profit in
that market. Getting there will be a challenge, however.
Posted Apr 20, 2004 17:11 UTC (Tue)
by vblum (guest, #1151)
[Link] (6 responses)
On the other hand, I'd much feel better about buying their stock if the money did not go directly into the pockets of Michael Robertson. This sounds like the CEO believes less in the bright future of his company than the size of his private stash of money. The combination of IPO -> Cash for Robertson is really bad PR for the IPO. Well, at least he's forthcoming about it.
Posted Apr 20, 2004 17:39 UTC (Tue)
by mmarsh (subscriber, #17029)
[Link] (5 responses)
Posted Apr 20, 2004 17:55 UTC (Tue)
by vblum (guest, #1151)
[Link] (3 responses)
In real life (not dotcom-economics), a company should generate a profit, and from that profit (a) repay debt the normal way and (b) pay its employees and shareholders. You do not generate continuous losses as a strategy and look for more investors whenever prudent. Here, the primary investor and motor behind the company is trying to withdraw his capital and have others step in. Not unusual, but perfectly troubling to potential investors before an IPO: Why is he doing this? Does he have doubts wrt the long-term viability of his investment - i.e. profitability of his very own company? (ii) They are doing the right thing about the M$ lawsuits - evade the suits by changing name. Use the money to build a good operating system instead. Robertson's choice of the Lindows name was a blatantly obvious free ride on MS's brand name recognition (remember, the distro was called Redmond Linux first?), and a foolhardy one. Better pull out now than maybe win a drawn-out lawsuit five years later due to technicalities alone, after bankruptcy.
Posted Apr 20, 2004 18:09 UTC (Tue)
by mmarsh (subscriber, #17029)
[Link]
While the proposed payment to Robertson might not be the best or most reassuring way to pay off that debt, it's hardly a divestment on his part. He'll likely remain the majority shareholder, and hence will have an interest in the continued success of the company. Minimizing the debts on Lindows' books by or shortly after the IPO might actually attract more investors, since any subsequent debts would be incurred by shareholder-approved actions. As far as the name change goes, I agree that it's better for them to change their product name, which was a pretty blantant gimmick. I could, however, see this having continued repercussions for Lindows, in that potential investors might question the CEO's judgement. Since he'll still be majority owner, it's not like they can buy stock and then force him out.
Posted Apr 20, 2004 18:51 UTC (Tue)
by piman (guest, #8957)
[Link]
Posted Apr 22, 2004 5:01 UTC (Thu)
by Ross (guest, #4065)
[Link]
Posted Apr 20, 2004 18:08 UTC (Tue)
by rjamestaylor (guest, #339)
[Link]
Posted Apr 20, 2004 17:43 UTC (Tue)
by rjamestaylor (guest, #339)
[Link] (4 responses)
Over the weekend I committed my family's Internet PC to Linspire 4.5. (I guess I'm into commercial Linux; I have Xandros on my laptop, RedHat ES 3.0 on my servers). My youngsters will play their Windows-based educational games on a non-networked Windows box (not sure if I will revert to Win98SE or leave it XP Home). I'm quite happy with CNR at $4.95/mo (on going) and the packaging Linspire brings to the home desktop. My wife, a non-technical RN and mother of three, has agreed to participate in GrokDoc's useability study and switch to using Linux (via Linspire) for her usual email, web surfing, letter writing, budgeting, and all-important solitare playing. To me it was either ~$50 a year for Lindows/Linspire or ~$50 a year for anti-virus software on Windows (I am not going to spend time administering my home systems while I can afford otherwise). Though I may have committed my home PC to Linspire I will think hard before jumping in on the "Refund Michael" IPO, especially with a "going concern" qualification from its auditors. This is 2004, not 1997. While CNR may go away, Debian, the distro beneath the covers, won't; therefore I am confident in my investment. Stocks, on the other hand, stand or fall on their own.
Posted Apr 20, 2004 19:06 UTC (Tue)
by proski (subscriber, #104)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Apr 20, 2004 19:16 UTC (Tue)
by rjamestaylor (guest, #339)
[Link] (2 responses)
RedHat, er, Fedora requires more "know how" than Lindows, er, Linspire, and more hand-holding than I wanted to give my home PC. I want my wife and kids to run the home PC without involving me. This is at their loving request so that they actually have some time with me when I'm actually making eye contact with them and responding to questions within the hour they were asked. Free as in Freedom is something I'll gladly pay for.
Posted Apr 21, 2004 15:52 UTC (Wed)
by proski (subscriber, #104)
[Link] (1 responses)
Anyway, I'm not trying to dissuade you from trying Lindows. I'm just trying to correct the notion that antivirus software costs money for home users. Windows users should not have an excuse not to run antivirus software as long as they run Windows.
Posted Apr 22, 2004 8:51 UTC (Thu)
by gyles (guest, #1600)
[Link]
Posted Apr 21, 2004 17:50 UTC (Wed)
by jneves (guest, #2859)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Apr 23, 2004 0:54 UTC (Fri)
by giraffedata (guest, #1954)
[Link] (1 responses)
But how do you square that with a balance sheet that says the corporation's total debts are 4.7 million dollars?
Could it be that the 10 million isn't debt at all, but stock that the company has a gentleman's agreement to buy back some day?
Posted Apr 23, 2004 9:11 UTC (Fri)
by jneves (guest, #2859)
[Link]
Posted Apr 22, 2004 13:30 UTC (Thu)
by jeremiah (subscriber, #1221)
[Link]
Ugh ... to raise money for a company which is burning throuhg its cash fast at this time - seems difficult. Lindows may have been a bit overly aggressive at times, but they certainly have tried to place themselves within a community. It would be sad if they went down at this early stage. Lindows goes for an IPO - a detailed look
I don't see the payment to Robertson as particularly troubling. He used some of his personal money to get the company going, and now that it's going public, and hence no longer "his", it seems reasonable to reimburse him for the seed money so that there's no further entanglement. I'd personally be worried about investing in a company where the BOD ousting the CEO could result in a $10 million lawsuit. 18% of the IPO target seems like quite a bit, but I'd be more concerned with the likelihood of the remaining 82% going to legal fees. If they bring in enough to cover their legal expenses with at least a few million left over, that certainly puts them in a better (and more secure) position than if MS's lawsuits bankrupt them. For the investors, the company then has some sort of validation that what they're doing is legally OK, as well as the psychological boost of "Microsoft tried to destroy them -- there must be something to this Lindows/Linspire thing."Lindows goes for an IPO - a detailed look
i) Payments to Robertson are not bad per se, but they create a bad feeling in the stomach. Lindows goes for an IPO - a detailed look
I thought it was more-or-less typical that a new company will bleed a little cash while establishing itself. The IPO then comes when it looks like a single big cash infusion would put the company on the path to real and sustained profitability. I have no idea how all of this applies to Lindows right now.Lindows goes for an IPO - a detailed look
Lycoris, not Lindows, was previously called Redmond Linux.
Lindows goes for an IPO - a detailed look
I think they changed their name to keep doing business. However I don'tThe Lawsuits
think they settled the lawsuits. At least in the US they were having some
success.
Public investors buy out private ones in an IPO
I don't see the payment to Robertson as particularly troubling. He used some of his personal money to get the company going, and now that it's going public, and hence no longer "his", it seems reasonable to reimburse him for the seed money so that there's no further entanglement
In an earlier post I alluded to the use of proceeds as "reimburse Michael fund" and I agree with you that buying out his position is not suspicious or unethical, but is how IPOs work: private investments are recouped and private ownership is thusly transferred to public investors. I Just wanted to clarify that I didn't mean to imply anything shaky was going on.
Thanks for the analysis, Jon.Comments from a Lindows^H^H^H^HSpire user
On the Windows side, Dr. Web is free and includes free updates (both "as in beer", of course). On the GNU/Linux side, Fedora is quite stable, and running "yum upgrade" is no more hassle than running an antivirus in Windows.
Comments from a Lindows^H^H^H^HSpire user
Oops. Dr. Web isn't free, anymore. It costs EUR40 for 1 year (evaluation versions are for evaluation not free long-term use).Comments from a Lindows^H^H^H^HSpire user
Sorry, I missed the distinction between "non-free freeware" and "non-free shareware". But then there is Avast, which claims for be free for home users.Comments from a Lindows^H^H^H^HSpire user
free-as-beer windows anti-virus
There's also AVG anti-virus from http://www.grisoft.com
The filling says that Robertson already gave the company 5.6 million dollars in 2004. If you add the possible interest of previous loans, the 10.4 million figure seems about right.
On the 10 million issue
On the 10 million issue
The balance sheet is about 2003. The 5.6 million dollars are from 2004.
On the 10 million issue
doomed I say...DOOMED! Mabey the whole SCO thing has put a bad taste in my mouth or something, but I just don't see how Lindows can make it. Too much litigation and direct competition with MS. Mr Robertson is being paid far too much for running a company that's burning cash like that. And 38 engs seems like a lot for such a small company. It looks like they don't really know how to leverage OSS. The concept of depending on Wine also just seems like a loosing battle.
Lindows goes for an IPO - a detailed look