Advertisement
Front, Kernel, Security, Distributions, Development. See your byline here on LWN.net.
| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Why not have both semanticsWhy not have both semanticsPosted Apr 9, 2004 12:16 UTC (Fri) by perlid (guest, #6533)Parent article: COW Links Is it impossible to in some way support both semantics? So that you give a certain flag to cp for same-inode-copying, and another flag for different-inode-copying? And the user can chose depending on the task it is intended for and if the applications are better compatible with one of the alternatives?
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||