|
hidden directoryhidden directoryPosted Apr 8, 2004 16:25 UTC (Thu) by giraffedata (subscriber, #1954)In reply to: /usr/local/ ? by rfunk Parent article: The User-Accessible Filesystem Hierarchy Standard
And why stick this stuff in hidden directories? I find that people use hidden files/directories as a means creating another level of directory; i.e. all the dot files in a directory are effectively in a subdirectory so they don't clutter a listing of the main directory. Frankly, I'd much prefer just to use the one directory hierarchy. It costs one subdirectory entry in a main directory to hide all the files that would otherwise be dot files. I have taken the matter into my own hands somewhat: My alias for 'ls' includes the --almost-all option. That means I see the dot files even though the package author didn't want me to. I find I am much happier actually seeing all my files. It does, unfortunately, make my home directory listing uncomfortably large, making me wish we had something like the .config/ standard mentioned in the article.
(Log in to post comments)
|
Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds
Powered by Rackspace Managed Hosting.