News and Editorials
An email from an editor of an online business publication asked a simple
question: what is the best Linux distribution for deploying on personal,
small business and enterprise desktops, and personal, small business and
enterprise servers? Based on user experiences and feedback over the last
couple of years, online discussions and general trends among the major Linux
distributions, the following would be my recommendations.
Personal desktop OS. Xandros Desktop or LindowsOS for
not-technical users, and Mandrakelinux or SUSE LINUX for the rest. Both
Xandros and LindowsOS have succeeded in bringing the Linux desktop closer to
the masses, with many user-friendly enhancements, excellent hardware
autodetection and support for popular consumer hardware, such as digital
cameras, scanners and wireless network cards. They are excellent for general
computing tasks. Those users who need more power will be better off with
either Mandrakelinux or SUSE LINUX. These two distributions are a lot more
powerful and complete than either Xandros or LindowsOS, and both can be
obtained for free from the Internet. Some would argue that Fedora Core should
also be considered in this category. However, its lack of out-of-the-box
multimedia support, as well as the obvious tendency of its developers to
concentrate on enterprise-level features, such as scalability and SELinux,
would make Fedora Core a better choice for the enterprise desktop than
personal desktop.
Small business desktop OS. Fedora Core and SUSE LINUX are
both excellent choices. For a small company with a limited IT budget, SUSE
LINUX is probably the best choice - it can be downloaded for free and it is
one of the most complete and well-designed distributions on the market.
Fedora Core 1 has to be the second favorite, its only drawback being its
current transition to Linux kernel 2.6 with SELinux functionality, which is
far from smooth. Xandros Business Desktop is also an excellent product, but
at US$495 for a 5-license pack, it is too expensive to compete effectively
with the other two, especially while the company still lacks brand
recognition and official support from major hardware vendors. Most recent
releases by Mandrakesoft had a reputation for being somewhat buggy, which
makes Mandrakelinux a less appealing candidate for a small business desktop,
at least until the company improves its quality control mechanisms.
Enterprise-level desktop OS. A lot depends on the company's
IT budget and the level of desired integration with the rest of its computing
infrastructure. If money is no object, it would be wise to get in touch with
both Red Hat and SUSE and obtain a quote for a complete solution. If money is
tight, Fedora Core is a very good choice - free and well supported by the
Fedora community. Having said that, it would be unfair to exclude other
vendors - Mandrakesoft is recovering from a financial disaster, so it might
be willing to offer an equivalent package for a fraction of the cost of Red
Hat or SUSE solutions. Another option is Sun Java Desktop System (based on
SUSE), but we don't hear much about this comparatively new product so it is
harder to voice an informed opinion.
Personal server OS. Debian or Slackware are the hardest to
beat. Besides being free, both of them have a reputation as the most solid,
reliable and trustworthy Linux operating systems on the market. Their
development models ensure superior quality control and both of them enjoy
unparalleled community support from many web sites and user communities.
Debian has always been the best distribution in terms of upgradeability to
new releases, but the inclusion of the "swaret" tool in the latest Slackware
means that Slackware can now also be upgraded with one command. Needless to
say, both Debian and Slackware pride themselves in providing timely security
updates.
Small business server OS. Same as above. Although Red Hat
Linux and its newly launched Fedora Core are still the dominant Linux
operating systems in most server rooms around the world, the company has
alienated many users by unpopular policy changes, pushing them towards its
more expensive enterprise products. On the other hand, Debian and Slackware
have been around for a long time and major policy changes are unlikely. For a
small business on a tight budget there really is no reason to spend money on
a operating system running its servers, except perhaps in some special
circumstances.
Enterprise-level server OS. If money is no object and the
company requires solid hardware support or the services of Oracle and other
third-party commercial applications, then it is probably best to get in touch
with either Red Hat or SUSE. In fact, Red Hat and SUSE are the only two Linux
distributions which are officially certified and supported by Oracle.
Enterprises on a tighter budget could possibly consider deploying Debian on
their servers. If support is needed, Red Hat and SUSE are in the best
position to offer it, albeit at a price. Third-party commercial support is
also available for Debian. Slackware is somewhat less appealing in this
category, simply because it might be a lot harder to find support and
personnel familiar with the distribution.
As always, these kinds of comparisons are bound to raise some controversy and
many will no doubt disagree with the choices. Nevertheless, writing things
down this way has resulted in an interesting conclusion: SUSE seems to be
providing the widest range of products for a variety of scenarios. These vary
from its biannual SUSE LINUX releases and specialized Linux Desktop and
Office Desktop solutions, to the company's Standard, Enterprise and
Openexchange server products. It also has the backing of Novell and its long
marketing arm to take on Red Hat. Are the prices too steep? In that case,
serious consideration could be given to deploying Debian, especially on
servers.
Comments (23 posted)
Distribution News
The
Debian Weekly News for April 6, 2004
contains the final call for DPL votes, a call for DebConf talk ideas, a
request for hotplug support, search for packages in the snapshot archive, a
few April Fools pranks, and more.
The Debian Project has announced that Debian
Security Advisories (DSA) have been declared CVE-compatible. "In an
effort to cooperate with the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
project to standardise the names for all publicly known vulnerabilities and
security exposures, new security advisories[3] have carried CVE names since
June 2002. Debian formally applied for CVE compatibility in May
2003."
Once known as Debian Internal projects, Custom
Debian Distributions are alive and well. Custom Debian Distributions
provide a solution for special groups of target users with different skills
and interests.
Here's an update on the preparation of
stable Debian 3.0r3, which now includes several updated kernel packages.
The final call for votes in the Debian
Project Leader election, is out. All votes must be received by April 10,
2004.
Comments (none posted)
The April 1st issue of the
Fedora News Updates
is available, with news about Fedora Core 2 test 2, the new X.org X11
implementation, SELinux revisited, and several other topics.
Fedora has fixed several bugs in gnome-session. This FC1 gaim update solves the history plugin crash,
makes Yahoo protocol work, and has "hundreds of other fixes".
Comments (none posted)
The Gentoo Weekly Newsletter for the week of March 29, 2004 is available.
Gentoo is seeking additional kernel developers and newsletter
contributors.
Full Story (comments: none)
Xandros has launched a 30-day evaluation version of the Desktop OS Business
Edition. The 30-day evaluation version of the Desktop OS Business Edition
is fully functional for 30 days and includes a PDF of the abridged User
Guide. The guide includes instructions on installing and configuring
Xandros Desktop OS as well as procedures for using the Windows networking
capabilities.
Full Story (comments: none)
Trustix has announced a range of pricing models for Trustix Secure
Enterprise Linux.
Full Story (comments: none)
Footnotes
announces the
GNOME 2.6 Release is now available for FreeBSD.
Comments (none posted)
The version of ls bundled with fileutils and, in later versions of
Mandrakelinux, coreutils would segfault on listing directories with a large
number of files in them, on the amd64 platform. The updated packages
correct the problem.
Full Story (comments: none)
There are plenty of upgrades this week, according to the
slackware-current
changelog, including the 2.6.5 kernel in testing.
Comments (none posted)
New Distributions
Vigyaan is a new special-purpose
live CD distribution that serves as an electronic workbench for
computational biology and computational chemistry. It has been designed to
meet the needs of both beginners and experts, with ready to use modeling
software. VigyaanCD v0.1 is based on KNOPPIX v3.3. VigyaanCD v0.1-beta was
released on March 22, 2004.
Comments (none posted)
Minor distribution updates
CDLinux has
released
stable
v0.4.8 with minor bugfixes. "
Changes: This release fixes a
mount failure problem on some sluggish USB devices. It fixes some bugs in
the dhcpcd, iptables, nic-detect, and kernel-module packages. There are
many package updates."
Comments (none posted)
INSERT has
released
v1.2.7 with major feature enhancements. "
Changes: Using the
Multivalent PDF Tools, the included information material was compressed to
about half the original size. This made room for avscan (a GUI for clamav)
and freshclam. A few small but quite useful tools were also added,
including BashBurn, iftop, and bash-programmable-completion. Memtest was
updated to its latest version, as was the clamav virus database."
Comments (none posted)
LinVDR has
released
v0.6 with major feature enhancements. "
Changes: Kernel 2.6.4 is
now used. ACPI support was improved. Several new plugins and patches were
added, including graphic LCD, improved OSD, serial buttons, signal
strength, vbox, and media detection. The installation system is now faster
and smaller and allows user interaction on any state of
installation."
Comments (none posted)
MoviX has released
v0.8.3 with minor bugfixes. "
Changes: A boot bug has been
fixed, so it now boots again from nearly any boot device you can think
of. When booting from the hard drive, you get full features with as little
as 64MB of RAM. You can automatically install it on disk partitions. French
and Russian translations have been improved. Pre-made international ISO
images are available in the downloads page."
Comments (none posted)
RIP
has released
v8.1.
"
Changes: The kernel and some software have been updated."
Comments (none posted)
SLAX Linux has released
v4.0.4 with major feature enhancements. "
Changes: This release
added Xfree 4.4.0, KDE 3.2.1, floppy tools, K3B 0.11.9, and an 845patch
boot option for Intel's i845G chipset. The lang= functionality was removed
and a load=... boot option that loads all specified modules from the
/optional/ directory (eg. load=wine,xmms,lang_fr) was implemented. smbmount
was fixed, as were FTP upload directory permissions."
Comments (none posted)
Distribution reviews
Linux.com
takes a look
at SUSE Linux 9.1 beta. "
OK, so things didn't work perfectly. That's
fine. This is a beta. Bugs are expected. Work will be done before it goes
gold. Most of the problems I ran into were the result of trying to swim
upstream by using Gnome instead of KDE. I expect the glitches will be gone
by the time SUSE 9.1 ships. That said, there were still a couple of things
I didn't care for."
Comments (none posted)
Open for Business
evaluates Mandrake Linux 9.2 and Fedora Core 1. "
Fortunately,
while neither Fedora Core 1 or Mandrake Linux 9.2 are where we would have
liked to have seen them, their successors are just around the
corner. Fedora Core 2 is nearly out, and Mandrake Linux 10.0 Official
Edition will be out in May."
Comments (none posted)
Page editor: Rebecca Sobol
Next page: Development>>