LWN.net Logo

The Aberdeen Group looks at free databases

The Aberdeen Group looks at free databases

Posted Mar 31, 2004 15:55 UTC (Wed) by tlewis (guest, #4195)
Parent article: The Aberdeen Group looks at free databases

> Many (free databases) are clearly deficient in at least the first three
> aforementioned technologies - they do not offer (or offer limited) stored
> procedures, do not offer two-phase commit, and do not offer exceptional
> multiprocessing support

Uhh, postgresql has had two-phase commit and stored procedures for as long as I can remember. As for exceptional multiprocessing support, if they mean multi-threaded execution of single queries then they are right. I would be happy to leave that segment of the market to oracle and have the free db's take the rest. 8^)


(Log in to post comments)

PG has two-phase??

Posted Mar 31, 2004 20:11 UTC (Wed) by Baylink (subscriber, #755) [Link]

When did that happen? And does it only do it with itself?

The Aberdeen Group looks at free databases

Posted Mar 31, 2004 21:55 UTC (Wed) by cajal (guest, #4167) [Link]

PostgreSQL does not have two-phase commit. There has been some discussion on the developers list about how to implement it, but it is still in the discussion stage.

The Aberdeen Group looks at free databases

Posted Apr 1, 2004 10:55 UTC (Thu) by pointwood (subscriber, #2814) [Link]

OTOH, According to the Firebird Factsheet, it supports this: http://www.firebirdsql.org/ff/foundation/FBFactsheet.html

Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds
Powered by Rackspace Managed Hosting.