| |||||||||||||
I think Andrea gets too much flack about 2.4.10I think Andrea gets too much flack about 2.4.10Posted Mar 6, 2004 18:59 UTC (Sat) by chip (subscriber, #8258)Parent article: Time to thrash the 2.6 VM? Andrea still describes 2.4.10 as a success -- it's right there in lkml this month -- and as a regular user of his kernel patches, I know I'm a satisfied customer.
(Log in to post comments)
I think Andrea gets too much flack about 2.4.10 Posted Mar 7, 2004 23:48 UTC (Sun) by garloff (subscriber, #319) [Link] 2.4.10 itself was not great. It had some rough edges.But after a few more revisions, 2.4 VM worked much better than before.
|
|||||||||||||