What's really wrong with DRM?

What's really wrong with DRM?

Posted Mar 6, 2004 1:09 UTC (Sat) by giraffedata (subscriber, #1954)
In reply to: What's really wrong with DRM? by brugolsky
Parent article: The Committee for Economic Development on digital copyright

What happens when you or your child is offered the alternative of buying 20 e-books with DRM (that, by the way, can only be read using some Microsoft e-book reader) for $5 apiece, or pay $50 each for the hardcover?

I believe the implication of this rhetorical question is that if DRM weren't legally available to a publisher, that the option instead would be 1) e-books without DRM for $5 apiece; 2) $50 each for hardcover.

I really doubt that's true. If DRM weren't legally available to a publishers, the $50 hardcopy would be the only option.

That's why I'm a big fan of DRM. Some day it will allow publishers to offer me product cheaper, and in more convenient form, than they can today.

---

(Log in to post comments)