|
Another Netfilter GPL enforcementAnother Netfilter GPL enforcementPosted Mar 3, 2004 11:01 UTC (Wed) by eru (subscriber, #2753)In reply to: Another Netfilter GPL enforcement by mongre26 Parent article: Another Netfilter GPL enforcement I suspect however that this most recent triumph of the GPL will be overlooked when the next "GPL not tested in court" FUD comes out. To counter it, it would be useful if some well-known web site listed a comprehensive collection of the publicly known cases where a GPL violation has been resolved out of court. At least it would demonstrate that "untested in court" does not equal "ineffective". A question for lawyers (or armchair lawyers): assuming that GPL keeps this "untested in court but still obeyed" status for a long time, would it count as precendent in an eventual court case? I'm aware this depends on the jurisdiction. In the old Swedish legal system, on which Finnish law is also based, "customs of the land" were considered as legally binding, if they are consistent, and there is no other applicable law. That advice can still be found in the prologue of Finnish law books, although I don't know if it affects rulings any more, especially as there are now laws about almost everything unlike in the old days. But a judge trying to make sense of a GPL violation case might make use of it.
(Log in to post comments)
Another Netfilter GPL enforcement Posted Mar 3, 2004 20:13 UTC (Wed) by oak (subscriber, #2786) [Link] GPL doesn't need to be tested in court. It goes like this:"You're using our copyrighted works, have you a license?" "Are you complying with it?" Case closed.
See Eben Moglen's excellent article on What's Free:
|
Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds
Powered by Rackspace Managed Hosting.