| |||||||||||
No more 24-bit atomic_tNo more 24-bit atomic_tPosted Feb 20, 2004 20:39 UTC (Fri) by ptr (guest, #5885)In reply to: No more 24-bit atomic_t by xorbe Parent article: No more 24-bit atomic_t Well, without digging deep, there should not be any (additional) dead locks, since always only up to one of the four locks is used per thread... Additionally, the atomicity dead lock is always the last. If the locking order was robust before, it will be after the change.
(Log in to post comments)
No more 24-bit atomic_t Posted Feb 21, 2004 4:09 UTC (Sat) by im14u2c (subscriber, #5246) [Link] Spinlocks disable preemption, right?
|
|||||||||||