| |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
"Undoubtably IBM-directed"?"Undoubtably IBM-directed"?Posted Feb 13, 2004 13:40 UTC (Fri) by chip (subscriber, #8258)Parent article: SCO update These works seem a bit strong for speculation.
(Log in to post comments)
"Undoubtably IBM-directed"? Posted Feb 13, 2004 15:37 UTC (Fri) by Max.Hyre (subscriber, #1054) [Link] You seem to have overlooked the <sarcasm></sarcasm> tags :-).
|
|||||||||||