Posted Feb 11, 2004 20:12 UTC (Wed) by tjc (guest, #137)
[Link]
Was missing a review of opera. Currently using version 7.23 for linux. Just curious: load this page and see how Opera does. Firefox passes all but 3 tests; IE 6 fails all but the first.
PASSes for Opera 7.23 and Konqueror 3.1.4
Posted Feb 11, 2004 21:13 UTC (Wed) by JLCdjinn (guest, #1905)
[Link]
Just gave it a shot. Opera 7.23 registers a pass on 0, 9, 10, 11, 12,
and 13. Konqueror 3.1.4 registers a pass on 0 and 1. Thanks for pointing
the test out - very interesting. A question, though. It seems like each
test is simply a query on a particular JavaScript built-in value; how
accurate is this in actually determining if a particular browser supports
the particular feature?
PASSes for Opera 7.23 and Konqueror 3.1.4
Posted Feb 11, 2004 23:14 UTC (Wed) by tjc (guest, #137)
[Link]
It seems like each test is simply a query on a particular JavaScript built-in value; how accurate is this in actually determining if a particular browser supports the particular feature?
Not very, but sometimes it's the best you can do. MSFT in particular is bad. IE 6 only passes level 1 core, but even then it doesn't correctly implement all the the required methods.
PASSes for Opera 7.23 and Konqueror 3.1.4
Posted Feb 12, 2004 17:32 UTC (Thu) by tjc (guest, #137)
[Link]
FYI, here's a link to the chapter in the ORA book from which I got this information:
It's very handy that the sample chapter they posted happens to be the one containing this information!
Like most O'reilly books this one is well above average. The first quarter of the book covers the JavaScript language, the second quarter covers web browsers as an execution environment, and the second half is a comprehensive reference. I own the 3rd and 4th editions, and recommend this book if you do any client-side web programming.
PASSes for Opera 7.23 and Konqueror 3.1.4
Posted Feb 12, 2004 18:20 UTC (Thu) by lypanov (subscriber, #8858)
[Link]
jfyi 3.2 konqueror passes 10 tests (well, assuming i can count :))
A grumpy user's browser review
Posted Feb 11, 2004 22:08 UTC (Wed) by wolfrider (guest, #3105)
[Link]
--Opera 6.12 for Linux:
W3C DOM Conformance Test
Level 1 Core/HTML Interfaces FAIL
Level 1 Core/XML Interfaces FAIL
Level 2 Core Interfaces PASS
Level 2 HTML Interfaces PASS
Level 2 XML Interfaces FAIL
Abstract View Interface FAIL
Generic Style Sheet Traversal FAIL
CSS Styles [Views] FAIL
CSS2 Properties Interface [CSS] FAIL
Event Handling Infrastructure PASS
User Interface Events [Events, Views] PASS
Mouse Events [UIEvents] PASS
HTML Events [Events] PASS
Document Mutation Events [Events] PASS
Document Range Interfaces FAIL
Document Traversal Interfaces FAIL
A grumpy user's browser review
Posted Feb 11, 2004 23:16 UTC (Wed) by tjc (guest, #137)
[Link]
Interesting that it fails level 1 core, yet passes level 2 core.
A grumpy user's browser review
Posted Feb 12, 2004 11:43 UTC (Thu) by pointwood (guest, #2814)
[Link]
AFAIK, Opera 7.x is *much* improved over Opera 6.x.
A grumpy user's browser review
Posted Feb 11, 2004 20:21 UTC (Wed) by NAR (subscriber, #1313)
[Link]
I use Opera too. And I just stare at those memory consumption values with dread in my eyes :-) The mentioned rendering times are also ridicolous - I didn't think my Duron 750 is that fast... And Opera has one more advangate - it works on other platforms too so I can easily keep the bookmarks in sync.