LWN.net Logo

Worst name...

Worst name...

Posted Feb 9, 2004 18:34 UTC (Mon) by sphealey (guest, #1028)
In reply to: Firefox???? by jensend
Parent article: Mozilla Firebird becomes Firefox

Worst. Project name. Ever.
There must be 10,000 names of lizards-type creatures that would be catchy and amusing, but it seems that someone has decided to put that thought down the memory hole.

sPh


(Log in to post comments)

Worst name...

Posted Feb 9, 2004 18:55 UTC (Mon) by KaiRo (subscriber, #1987) [Link]

Read Ben's blog posting to see how they came around to chose that name. It was not out-of-the-blue or anything similar. The project leaders went through a list of over two hundred names that had been proposed, seeing none was either something they liked, or legally OK. Then they started looking through names sttarting with fire- so that they could keep some of their flame imagery they already had from Phoenix and Firebird times.

And to quote the Firefox name FAQ:

"But I hate the new name. It's stupid.

Our editors are trying to figure out whether this is a question. Of course not everyone will like the new name, especially at first. We're confident most people will quickly get used to it. New names have a way of sounding terrible at first. If you're unhappy with the new name, consider trying out the many improvements we've made in the latest release of our browser - we hope that'll make you feel better. After all, what's most important is how the thing works, not what it's called.

-- Steve Garrity, Gervase Markham, Ben Goodger, Bart Decrem et al. "

Worst name...

Posted Feb 9, 2004 23:37 UTC (Mon) by fLameDogg (guest, #11305) [Link]

FWIW, I like the name.

Copyright © 2012, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds