Posted Jan 20, 2004 21:24 UTC (Tue) by dlang (subscriber, #313)
[Link]
if the problem can really be reduced down to a few spam friendly ISP's like this then you can blacklist these ISP's without getting into the current nightmare of blacklisting
Going Upstream to Fight Spam (Wired)
Posted Jan 29, 2004 13:09 UTC (Thu) by job (guest, #670)
[Link]
.. which leaves us with *exactly* the same situation as today.
Going Upstream to Fight Spam (Wired)
Posted Jan 20, 2004 21:27 UTC (Tue) by sab39 (guest, #2185)
[Link]
It doesn't, but it's pretty simple to blacklist emails whose sender address is one of those domains.
Since domains have non-zero cost and it'll take very little time for any new spam-friendly (sender-permitted-from-known-spam-IPs) domains to make it into blacklists, this is probably a significant increase in the cost of sending spam - get a new domain every day or two with appropriate SPFs.
This measure is basically intended to prevent spoofed email, which is a large proportion of spam and virus email. It doesn't (by itself) stop spam, but it makes it a lot easier to identify, trace, and control by other means.
Personally, I expect the effect on virus mail will be much greater than the effect on spam - that's usually very naive about email spoofing and would blatantly violate all SPF records whenever they're present for the spoofed domain.