| |||||||||||||
Read-copy-update and interrupt latencyRead-copy-update and interrupt latencyPosted Jan 15, 2004 4:54 UTC (Thu) by jzbiciak (✭ supporter ✭, #5246)Parent article: Read-copy-update and interrupt latency Is it just me, or did anyone else read krcud as kcrud? Fitting name for a task that's meant to garbage collect, IMHO.
(Log in to post comments)
Read-copy-update and interrupt latency Posted Jan 15, 2004 5:03 UTC (Thu) by hisdad (subscriber, #5375) [Link] Yeah, me too.I've long thought the kernel needed a thread like that.. Regards Dad
Read-copy-update and interrupt latency Posted Jan 15, 2004 5:17 UTC (Thu) by iabervon (subscriber, #722) [Link] I wonder if anyone actually read krcud as krcud. My first thought was that sysadmins aren't going to be happy about the rcud building up in their process tables.
Read-copy-update and interrupt latency Posted Jan 15, 2004 18:26 UTC (Thu) by freethinker (guest, #4397) [Link] No, kcrud is the SCO version. Which explains a few things...
|
|||||||||||||