Weekly Edition
Return to the Press page
| |||||||||||
SCO's Missing Risk Factor (Groklaw)
Groklaw points out that SCO's regulatory filings are missing one important "risk factor" for its investors. "If you look through the SCO SEC filings as I have been doing, you may find, as I have been finding so far, that SCO appears not to have listed receiving those letters from Novell or mentioned that Novell was still contesting SCO's copyright claims on UNIX as a risk factor in their recent filings."
(Log in to post comments)
SCO's Missing Risk Factor (Groklaw) Posted Jan 8, 2004 14:59 UTC (Thu) by fghorow (subscriber, #5229) [Link] Hmm. This kind of smells like allegations of security fraud. Might the SEC be interested in complaints in order to investigate such allegations?
SCO's Missing Risk Factor (Groklaw) Posted Jan 8, 2004 19:27 UTC (Thu) by mhbell (guest, #15728) [Link] I think that the SEC would be interested , But I doubt if an investor would complain to them befor dumping his/her stock.
SCO's Missing Risk Factor (Groklaw) Posted Jan 15, 2004 9:59 UTC (Thu) by ekj (subscriber, #1524) [Link] Not at all. Infact, I complained to the SEC myself just now. And I am an SCO investor.<p>Before you all jump on me: I sold them short. Thus if SCOs stock-price falls, I make a profit. Not all investors are interested in stock-prices staying inflated.
|
|||||||||||