The Savannah Compromise - what really happened?
Posted Jan 4, 2004 6:43 UTC (Sun) by
Ross (subscriber, #4065)
In reply to:
The Savannah Compromise - what really happened? by spotter
Parent article:
The Savannah Compromise - what really happened?
What I wished for was that chroot() would be considered a capability and
that it could be disabled. In fact, capabilities in Linux aren't very
useful because they can only restrict actions that are already reserved
for the superuser. So I can't, for example, say that this process and its
children can't call ptrace(), chroot(), etc.
(
Log in to post comments)