LWN.net Logo

GSA and GWU Co-Sponsor Open Source in Government Conference

From:  "Tony Stanco" <Tony-AT-egovos.org>
To:  <undisclosed-recipients-AT-egovos.org>
Subject:  GSA and GWU Co-Sponsor Open Source in Government Conference March 15-17, 2004, in Washington DC
Date:  Tue, 30 Dec 2003 11:02:17 -0500
Cc:  "Tony Stanco" <Tony-AT-egovos.org>

The Center of Open Source & Government and the General Services
Administration are co-sponsoring a conference in Washington, DC, March
15-17, 2004 at George Washington University on the question, "How does Open
Source provide an Innovative Solution for E-Government?"

The Open Source conference will raise awareness of the suitability and
maturity of open source for the development, acquisition and management of
software solutions. Industry CIO's are reporting lower total cost of
ownership (TCO) by adopting high-quality and proven open source solutions.
In addition to low or non-existent initial acquisition costs, the open
source model leverages external expertise to complement in-house integration
and customization skillsets. In short, the Open Source movement offers
commodity software solutions as viable alternatives to proprietary software.
The movement's open development and governance models enable a culture of
sharing, and provides a framework in which to build high quality and secure
solutions.

The E-Gov Act promotes the use of Internet and Emerging Technologies within
and across Government agencies in providing citizen-centric Government
information and services. The E-Gov Act also encourages collaboration among
Federal, State, local, and tribal government leaders on electronic
Government in the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, as well as
leaders in the private and nonprofit sectors. This cross sector
collaboration promotes the sharing of best practices and innovative
approaches in acquiring, using, and managing information resources for the
Government [Section 3602(f)(9) E-Government Act 2002].

It is within this legislative framework that the next E-Gov Open Source in
Government Conference will engage leaders from the Federal, State, local and
international government arena, the Open Source community, industry,
academia, nonprofits, industry associations and the general public to answer
the question, "How does Open Source Provide an Innovative Solution for
E-Government?"

For more information see the conference website at www.egovos.org or contact
Tony Stanco at 202-994-5513.

[NOTE: The university is terminating the seas server this month, so if you
are using stanco@seas.gwu.edu, please update your address book to
stanco-AT-gwu.edu and Tony-AT-egovos.org, now.]

Best regards,

Tony Stanco, Esq.
Executive Director
The Center of Open Source & Government
http://www.eGovOS.org
tony-AT-egovos.org

Associate Director
Open Source and eGovernment
Cyber Security, Policy, and Research Institute
George Washington University
[NSA Center of Excellence in Information Assurance]
2033 K Street, NW, Suite 340
Washington, DC 20006
Washington Office: 202-994-5513
Baltimore Office: 410-366-8974
fax       202-994-5505
http://www.cpi.seas.gwu.edu
Stanco-AT-gwu.edu



(Log in to post comments)

Question: Ugh!

Posted Dec 30, 2003 21:03 UTC (Tue) by AnswerGuy (subscriber, #1256) [Link]

"How does Open Source Provide an Innovative Solution for E-Government?"

It's a pity this question is so transparently leading and "buzzy."

I would pose the following question to the organizers and prospective participants of this conference: what are the questions we should be asking about the use of open source and free software in all levels of government?

It's obvious that one particular segment of the private sector has an entrenched interest in preventing (or minimizing) widespread adoption of free software, by governments and others. We can expect well-funded lobbying and press releases from the commercial software publishers (including Oracle, Computer Associates, etc, as well as every free software enthusiast's favorite villain).

That's too obvious, though. A question would be: what are the opposing interests to free software adoption in government?

These might include internal and non-private sector constituents. For example managerial status (and pay grades?) for many government (and private sector) jobs are established by the size of one's operating budget. So, some of the managers might consider cost savings to undercut their status (and even their own compensation). Also the means for budgeting and accounting for software licensing expenditures is well established --- ingrained even. Managers may perceive a risk of hidden costs in free software. (We all have been conditioned to look such gift horses in the mouth because advertisers have been abusing the term "free" for decades now). They may also, rightly, be concerned about how to account for support and customization costs in free software. It may be somewhat more difficult to approve services and consulting or custom programming contracts than purchases and standard licensing. It is certainly easier to deal with large vendors then small ones.

There are many other such questions that we should be asking!

Question: Ugh!

Posted Dec 30, 2003 22:15 UTC (Tue) by dang (subscriber, #310) [Link]

Aside from Senior Executive Service gigs, compensation for Federal employment follows the GS schedule ( with regional COLA ). If there is finanacial incentive it is more due to the lingering threat of outsourcing work in the name of small government ( which outsourcing has a nice track record of raising costs, but which people tend to vote for nonetheless ).

Fear, ignorance and mini turf-wars are the real impediment ( well that and whatever leverage trickles down from lobby dollars at work ).

Question: Ugh!

Posted Dec 31, 2003 18:47 UTC (Wed) by ordonnateur (guest, #6652) [Link]

So, some of the managers might consider cost savings to undercut their status (and even their own compensation). Also the means for budgeting and accounting for software licensing expenditures is well established --- ingrained even.
Another related factor is the difference between capital expenditure and maintenace. Bundling expenditure into projects appeals to large public sector organisations (I speak here of my UK academic experience). The result is that money is more readily available for hardware and software than for the employment of people to maintain the system. FOSS is at a disadvantage in this context, the capital budget is reduced but what is needed is a willingness to contribute resources back to development.

Copyright © 2003, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds