LWN.net Logo

LindowsOS or Xandros Desktop?

December 17, 2003

This article was contributed by Ladislav Bodnar

Earlier this week, two almost simultaneous release announcements from Lindows.com and Xandros Corporation provided some entertainment during the otherwise quiet, pre-holiday season. Lindows.com's LindowsOS 4.5 and Xandros Corporation's Xandros Desktop 2.0 are in many ways similar products with a more or less identical target market. If you still need a Christmas present for a less technically inclined member of your family or if you find it hard to make a decision whether to get one or the other, then this brief feature comparison might be of help.

Installation.. Both LindowsOS and Xandros Desktop provide easy system installation in no more than a few clicks. Both have excellent auto-detection of most hardware, including hundreds of digital cameras and many wireless network cards. However, the Xandros installer is a lot more sophisticated in its advanced mode - it allows partition resizing, custom software selection, user setup and even some advanced security configuration. It detects an existing Xandros installation and offers an upgrade path while preserving user data and settings. In contrast, the LindowsOS installer is primitive even in its "advanced" mode, with the only available choice being an option to specify a partition to which to install the operating system. LindowsOS 0, Xandros 1.

First impressions. While developers of both products have clearly done many usability studies to make migration from Windows as easy as possible, LindowsOS has been more imaginative in this effort. A series of well-presented audiovisual tutorials on various subjects is a good example of that. On top of it, Lindows.com arguably employs more talented graphics designers, a fact that is further enhanced by the availability of stunning scenic desktop backgrounds, beautiful icons and a matching default desktop theme. Although Xandros does have an advantage in providing a more comprehensive printed manual, this round will have to go to LindowsOS for its combination of an eye-catching desktop, innovative tutorials, and jargon-free product guides easily palatable by even a less technically skilled audience. LindowsOS 1, Xandros 0.

Applications. Earlier versions of LindowsOS were criticized for having a very limited set of available applications out of the box. This has improved in version 4.5, with previously absent OpenOffice.org, CD burner and certain multimedia applications, such as RealPlayer, now provided without having to subscribe to the $50-a-year Click-N-Run service. Still, Xandros Desktop 2.0 comes on two CDs with a larger range of applications. It is also more up-to-date with KDE 3.1.4 (as opposed to KDE 3.0.1 in LindowsOS 4.5) and OpenOffice.org 1.1.0. It can't be a coincidence that LindowsOS 4.5 ships with an older OpenOffice.org 1.0.3, while it uses every opportunity to promote the non-free StarOffice 7. LindowsOS 0, Xandros 1.

Online updates. One of the strong points of LindowsOS is its excellent Click-N-Run (CNR) service for one-click software installation and updates. Perhaps inspired by CNR, Xandros has a similar service, called Xandros Networks. Although not as sophisticated as its LindowsOS counterpart, it does the job of installing applications, and it does it so for free (installing certain applications requires free online registration). Nevertheless, the CNR service is better designed with comprehensive package information, options to group applications into software "aisles" for batch installation and availability of many interesting commercial applications and games at greatly reduced prices. We'll give this round to LindowsOS: LindowsOS 1, Xandros 0.

Special features. Both LindowsOS and Xandros are quick to point out many unique characteristics of their products. The latest LindowsOS comes with a SIPphone, an Internet telephony application (see this screenshot) which allows users to place free telephone calls anywhere in the world. SIPphone requires a broadband connection to be effective, but our brief tests with the application showed excellent voice quality. The catch? The phone calls can only be made to a physical SIPphone, a product by Lindows.com's sister company SIPphone, Inc, or another user running LindowsOS. Other new features in LindowsOS 4.5 are remote desktop sharing and a Google-powered web page search and translation service nicely integrated into Mozilla's right click menu.

Xandros, on the other hand, has focused its development on the excellent Xandros File Manager, providing many pleasant features. These include drag-and-drop archive creation and audio ripping, seamless file sharing across mixed networks and integrated drag-and-drop CD burning. The "switch user" feature is a convenient tool for quick desktop switching between several virtual desktops. The Deluxe Edition also comes with CrossOver Office and Plugin for running certain Windows applications under Linux. This round ends in a draw: LindowsOS 1, Xandros 1.

Price. LindowsOS costs $49.95 (download) or $59.95 (retail package), while Xandros sells for $39.95 (Basic Edition) or $89.95 (Deluxe Edition). The cost of LindowsOS is slightly misleading, because it costs additional $49.95 per year to join the CNR service, without which the product isn't nearly as much fun. However, after joining CNR, all future product updates, including newly released ISO images are free as long as the CNR membership is maintained. Still, the $39.95 Xandros Desktop Standard Edition is probably a better value, especially since it includes a lot more software than LindowsOS and it does not require regular payments. LindowsOS 0, Xandros 1.

Conclusion. Even after comparing many aspects of the two products, it is still hard to pick a winner. Xandros has a superior installer, more software and is better value for the money, while LindowsOS has more eye-candy, imaginative tutorials and the excellent Click-N-Run service. Some users might also value certain non-technical aspects of these products - those interested in online interaction with other users will find LindowsOS forums more active, while others might prefer to support a company that contributes back to the Linux community; unlike Xandros, Lindows.com sponsors several open source projects, such as Gaim. The innovative SIPphone application might be another good reason to prefer LindowsOS. But some might be put off by a constant barrage of anti-Microsoft propaganda found in Lindows.com newsletters and press releases, with more court battles with the Redmond software giant over the name "Lindows" coming up in the near future.

Both LindowsOS 4.5 and Xandros Desktop 2.0 are excellent distributions that won't disappoint.


(Log in to post comments)

LindowsOS or Xandros Desktop?

Posted Dec 18, 2003 6:01 UTC (Thu) by proski (subscriber, #104) [Link]

SIPphone requires a broadband connection to be effective
From Merriam-Webster:
1 : operating at, responsive to, or comprising a wide band of frequencies <a broadband radio antenna>
2 : of, relating to, or being a communications network in which a frequency range is divided into multiple independent channels for simultaneous transmission of signals (as voice, data, or video)
Let's avoid non-professional use of the word "broadband" for all fast internet connections. Leave market speak to marketoids. Ethernet is not broadband, yet it works with VoIP applications just fine, better than asymmetric broadband connections.

LindowsOS or Xandros Desktop?

Posted Dec 18, 2003 14:10 UTC (Thu) by lutchann (subscriber, #8872) [Link]

That's a fight you're going to lose; you might as well try to convince people to only use "bandwidth" in its original RF meaning.

LindowsOS or Xandros Desktop?

Posted Dec 18, 2003 16:54 UTC (Thu) by proski (subscriber, #104) [Link]

Not necessarily. Marketing speak has a short live. As soon as something better than broadband becomes commercially available, "broadband" as a marketing term will fade, just like "multimedia computer" and "high density floppy disk".

Regardless of whether it's a losing battle or not, I expect LWN to respect its readers. If I want to read reviews peppered with marketing speak I can read PC Magazine instead.

LindowsOS or Xandros Desktop?

Posted Dec 22, 2003 10:25 UTC (Mon) by gallir (guest, #5735) [Link]

I don't think your Ethernet connection will give you "telephone calls
anywhere in the world", so your comment is even more misleading.

In any case, can you explain in fewer "technical" words how would you
call it? High bandwidth? (wrong) "Good ADSL or DSL or xDSL or good
cable-modem or T1 or T3 or ..." ?

LindowsOS or Xandros Desktop?

Posted Dec 25, 2003 22:25 UTC (Thu) by kervel (guest, #9133) [Link]

also, i guess the SIP in SIPphone stands for the SIP protocol, so the
sipphone software can be used to call other SIP devices, software like
kphone (not gnomemeeting unfortunately, gnomemeeting is H.323), windows
messenger, ... also, there are companies offering SIP->PSTN relay (so you
can call all phones if you are willing to pay a relay ISP, often cheaper
than a real PSTN call). also check FWD, an attempt to create a new free
telephone network.

so i think the author is wrong in his statement that SIPphone is only
useful to call other lindows users or SIPphone hardware owners. Or is it
an artificial limitation introduced by lindows ?

LindowsOS or Xandros Desktop?

Posted Dec 18, 2003 8:11 UTC (Thu) by hingo (guest, #14792) [Link]

Does Lindows still persist in having a default installation where the user ends up being
root with a blank password? We should never ever recommend such a distribution to
anyone, im not-even-very-humble o.

henrik

LindowsOS or Xandros Desktop?

Posted Dec 18, 2003 9:58 UTC (Thu) by beejaybee (guest, #1581) [Link]

Yes. Security should be taken seriously. The combination of relatively inexperienced users & relatively insecure default configurations is a recipe for Microsoft-style disasters.

LindowsOS or Xandros Desktop? -- points about lindows

Posted Dec 18, 2003 16:41 UTC (Thu) by openhacker (subscriber, #1614) [Link]

I've had very negative experiences with lindows (installing
and helping my friend).

The default is root, but you can override it. But it takes
2 minutes to explain why you shouldn't run as root...this is
such a dumbed down distro -- I don't understnad why they don't.


I helped a friend install lindows 2.0 and 4.0 -- and various
system admin tools (and man and info) are not there
(you have to see the documentation through the X help browser --
I'm not sure whether the default was kde or gnome now).

When my friend calls me on the phone, it would be very nice if I can
give her some hints to try to understand a problem, like:

type in lspci

or

type in hdparm

and do

man hdparm

for more information

Unfortunately, these commands don't exist in the distro (there may be equivalent
functionality in many cases with a GUI interface), but command lines
are useful to give remotely -- GUIs you have to demonstrate...

(geez, don't people realize this?)

But it did install in about 10 minutes, which was kinda amazing...


marty

LindowsOS or Xandros Desktop?

Posted Dec 18, 2003 23:55 UTC (Thu) by chrism (guest, #4713) [Link]

I think pigeonholing Xandros into a "newbies distro" category might be a bit limiting. I've been a UNIX user since about 1993 (Linux since about 1996) and I find Xandros 1.x a good fit for me. I havent yet tried 2.0, but it appears similar. If you want a distro that "just works", I'd recommend it.

Lindows OS 3:4 Xandros

Posted Dec 19, 2003 16:01 UTC (Fri) by mwilck (guest, #1966) [Link]

Just in case other readers also wonder, that are the final scores if I am counting right.

Copyright © 2003, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds