| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Bob Young writes a letter to DarlBob Young writes a letter to DarlPosted Dec 13, 2003 12:47 UTC (Sat) by bojan (subscriber, #14302)In reply to: Bob Young writes a letter to Darl by danw6144 Parent article: Bob Young writes a letter to Darl If the licence in question was a BSD licence, would your imaginary case be any different? I think not - BSD licence imposes different conditions, but it does impose them. And it seems that the judge in BSD v USL case thought that the licence is quite valid. I don't see how GPL would be different in that regard. For that matter, people have been mentioning (especially ESR) licensing Linux kernel under a new "Open Software Licence", which doesn't seem any different either in that regard. I was just wondering what you think of the above...
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||