| |||||||||||
Here comes a delayHere comes a delayPosted Dec 10, 2003 21:51 UTC (Wed) by Ken (guest, #14505)Parent article: SCO press release on DDOS attack
I see SCO claiming they need to delay complying with discovery because of this. Note that they specifically say it affected their internal network. I hope this can be a proven as false or self inflicted and the judge takes action on it.
(Log in to post comments)
Here comes a delay Posted Dec 10, 2003 22:13 UTC (Wed) by vblum (subscriber, #1151) [Link] Oh, good point. Especially since the intranet claim stinks - do they not own a firewall? Or did the DDoS attack really target their utilities company and backup generators?
Here comes a delay Posted Dec 10, 2003 22:14 UTC (Wed) by Ross (subscriber, #4065) [Link] Yeah, that's really the weakest part of the claim. How a SYNattack against the public webserver would shut down the internal network is unclear. Maybe they don't use a DMZ for publicly provided services?!
|
|||||||||||