| |||||||||||||
The CAN-SPAM bill examinedThe CAN-SPAM bill examinedPosted Dec 8, 2003 19:35 UTC (Mon) by gswoods (subscriber, #37)In reply to: The CAN-SPAM bill examined by tegbert Parent article: The CAN-SPAM bill examined Well, the IP address of our mail server isn't recycled unless we choose to change it. I would certainly like the ability to tell other mail servers around the net that if a mail message purports to come from one of our users, but it doesn't come from the address of our main mail cluster, then it's a forgery and should be rejected.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||