| |||||||||||||
The CAN-SPAM bill examinedThe CAN-SPAM bill examinedPosted Dec 4, 2003 12:29 UTC (Thu) by Wol (guest, #4433)In reply to: The CAN-SPAM bill examined by jmason Parent article: The CAN-SPAM bill examined The other neat European trick - the company who's products are being marketed is responsible for maintaining the list - so if you do reply to an "opt-out", they can't then give the list to a different company and send you the same (or similar) spam again. But how soon will it be before a BIG company sues the Direct Marketing Association for denial-of-service. I've heard of at least one company complain that their broadband connection was being hammered so bad by spam that their mail-server (configured for "rejection on header", therefore obviously not MS Exchange), couldn't keep up with the flood unless it had EXCLUSIVE use of the connection ... Cheers,
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||