| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
alternatives (monotone)alternatives (monotone)Posted Nov 25, 2003 9:11 UTC (Tue) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313)In reply to: alternatives (monotone) by docolczyk Parent article: Linus & the Lunatics, Part I (Linux Journal) go look at bitkeeper, you do copy/merge at the repository level, not at the file level you are used to doing with CVS. instead each developer has their own entire repository and you merge back and forth between them
(Log in to post comments)
alternatives (monotone) Posted Dec 11, 2003 10:50 UTC (Thu) by docolczyk (guest, #14874) [Link] I took a very brief look at bitkeeper then quickly ran away.Lately I've been hearing some nasty comments about it's licensing. So I checked that out first. The liccense ( of the free version )could only be viewed after you downloaded and installed the software. To me that just sent upn too many red flags. Any oninions on the elternatives?
|
|
||||||||||||