The Consumer Electronics Linux Forum (CELF) has
announced the release of its baseline Linux source code, now available
for download and review.
(Log in to post comments)
Mainline kernel
Posted Nov 24, 2003 21:06 UTC (Mon) by Ross (subscriber, #4065)
[Link]
Will they be trying to merge these improvements into the mainline kernel and take improvements from it and merge it into this tree? If not I could see the mainline kernel quickly diverging from this release...
Mainline kernel
Posted Nov 24, 2003 21:29 UTC (Mon) by pblanco (guest, #16087)
[Link]
I wasn't able to get to the tree via their webpage. Has anyone been able to access it yet?
Re: Mainline kernel
Posted Nov 25, 2003 17:49 UTC (Tue) by amimjf (guest, #506)
[Link]
it looks like its just 2.4.20 with MontaVista's patches applied.
having said that the diff to 2.4.20 is 58mb, but thats mostly because they removed most of arch/ and added a few extra bits.
they have added other peoples patches like Robort Love's preempt kernel patch, Ingo Molnar's (O)1 sched and some other 2.5 bits.
not all that excting.
Source Tree...where?
Posted Nov 24, 2003 22:47 UTC (Mon) by bryam (guest, #6857)
[Link]
Yes...where are the source Luke?
CE Linux Forum Publishes Baseline Source Tree
Posted Nov 25, 2003 16:44 UTC (Tue) by miannac (subscriber, #11411)
[Link]
I understand the importance of press releases, but this one sounds like a bit ... empty! Did you try to access to the provided URL? It is saying that the tree server will be available soon.
I think that LWN should better check those press release communication: the Net is full of empty press releases... I'm not happy to get them on a paid service.
Marco
CE Linux Forum Publishes Baseline Source Tree
Posted Nov 25, 2003 16:51 UTC (Tue) by corbet (editor, #1)
[Link]
It is pretty common that somebody issues a PR, but hasn't quite managed to get the code into the promised location yet. The code generally does show up; people don't send out those releases for nothing. So if the subject looks interesting, we go ahead and post it. In this case, they seem to be having more than the usual amount of trouble getting their act together. I do assume it will happen at some point, though.
The code is up now
Posted Nov 25, 2003 17:57 UTC (Tue) by tbird20d (subscriber, #1901)
[Link]
Sorry for the delay. This is one of the first press releases of the forum, and our processes were not, uhmmm.. well-coordinated.
The source and information about the tree is available at: http://tree.celinuxforum.org/
To answer one of the other posts, we wish to NOT diverge (fork) and will submit patches against kernel.org trees as the technologies are refined and ratified by the forum.
Some of the technologies in the tree are backports (to 2.4.20) of things already in 2.6 - like kernel preemption, the O(1) scheduler, and a form of work queues. Some things are available separately, but are not part of kernel.org yet (like high-resolution POSIX timers and Dynamic Power Management). Other things are new, like a ram file system that is robust against kernel failures, some improvements in bootup time, and fixes to some existing-but-apparently-broken features, like IDE "noprobe".
We'll be publishing more information about the various technologies in this tree by the end of the year.
Tim Bird Architecture Group Co-Chair CE Linux Forum
Two questions
Posted Nov 26, 2003 7:51 UTC (Wed) by bryam (guest, #6857)
[Link]
1 - Is Hewlett Packard member of the CE Linux Forum?
and
2 - Are you thinking to cooperate with the Open Source Development Lab (www.osdl.org) like one workgroup or similar way?