| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Gartner: SCO's Legal Fees Could Jeopardize Its Software BusinessGartner: SCO's Legal Fees Could Jeopardize Its Software BusinessPosted Nov 20, 2003 21:38 UTC (Thu) by rev (guest, #15082)In reply to: Gartner: SCO's Legal Fees Could Jeopardize Its Software Business by jre Parent article: Gartner: SCO's Legal Fees Could Jeopardize Its Software Business I was thinking this very same thing this afternoon. Seriously. It would be a pity if SCO would go bankrupt A SCO bankrupcy would no doubt be exploited as a FUD point (see what happens if you get involved in this OSS IP mess?). Not only that, there is reason to believe there's going to be another SCO. So in the long run it might be best to keep SCO alive until it can be beaten the shit out of in the courts so that it serves as a deterent for a company that might otherwise be tempted to find istelf another SCO. In addition, the OSS community donating a substantial amount of $$ to "keep SCO afloat so that it lies and FUD can be squashed in the courtroom" would be a pretty bold PR move that is in my mind likely to make some journalist wonder whether SCO is right after all. Just a wild idea.
(Log in to post comments)
Gartner: SCO's Legal Fees Could Jeopardize Its Software Business Posted Nov 20, 2003 22:41 UTC (Thu) by mmarq (guest, #2332) [Link] Good point...The thing that i found most disgusting about the possibility of another SCO, is that "shepherd mentality", that, the better way to make a living, is to steal from everybody else values and merits... And if you really think about it, then the conclusion that most strikes the mind, is that there isn't sheep without a shepherd, or better, when you can only see flocks of sheep the shepperd is not far. So better than beat SCO, the community must really think about not being sheep to anyone or anything, and play together very loud the Open Standards horn so that the patents shepherds can stay away.
|
|
||||||||||||