Weekly edition	Kernel	Security	Distributions	Contact Us	Search
Archives	Calendar	Subscribe	Write for LWN	LWN.net FAQ	Sponsors

Subscibers vs Non-subcribers

Posted Nov 20, 2003 15:54 UTC (Thu) by mceesay (guest, #2806)
In reply to: Paid comments by chalsall
Parent article: On comment abuse

I agree with the parent post.

Reserve comments for subscribers-only. Non-subscribers can write a Letter to the Editor to express their views.

(Log in to post comments)

Posted Nov 20, 2003 17:21 UTC (Thu) by yohan555 (guest, #4253) [Link]

I definitely second that. This would be an additional incentive to
subscribe as well...

J. Weiss

Subscibers vs Non-subcribers

Posted Nov 25, 2003 17:37 UTC (Tue) by cthulhu (guest, #4776) [Link]

I definitely agree with the reserving comments to subscribers, with
letters to the editor if the non-subs really want to get through. I paid
for quality content; I'd like to keep it that way.

If the non-subs want to comment so badly (with their insightful
comments), they should become a subscriber anyway. Obviously, commenting
is important to such a reader, so they should help us keep LWN going by
subscribing.