| |||||||||||
Subscibers vs Non-subcribersSubscibers vs Non-subcribersPosted Nov 20, 2003 15:54 UTC (Thu) by mceesay (guest, #2806)In reply to: Paid comments by chalsall Parent article: On comment abuse I agree with the parent post. Reserve comments for subscribers-only. Non-subscribers can write a Letter to the Editor to express their views.
(Log in to post comments)
Subscibers vs Non-subcribers Posted Nov 20, 2003 17:21 UTC (Thu) by yohan555 (guest, #4253) [Link] I definitely second that. This would be an additional incentive tosubscribe as well... J. Weiss
Subscibers vs Non-subcribers Posted Nov 25, 2003 17:37 UTC (Tue) by cthulhu (guest, #4776) [Link] I definitely agree with the reserving comments to subscribers, withletters to the editor if the non-subs really want to get through. I paid for quality content; I'd like to keep it that way. If the non-subs want to comment so badly (with their insightful comments), they should become a subscriber anyway. Obviously, commenting is important to such a reader, so they should help us keep LWN going by subscribing.
|
|||||||||||