Thomas Bushnell removed from Hurd development
Posted Nov 19, 2003 22:40 UTC (Wed) by
steven97 (guest, #2702)
In reply to:
Thomas Bushnell removed from Hurd development by ccchips
Parent article:
Thomas Bushnell is no longer Hurd maintainer
Is Newton a has-been? Not really. But surely in his time people must
have felt he was, because from all the honory chairs and influential
positions he held, he was blocking the creativity and freedom of other
scientists of his era.
Socrates is certainly a has-been, no doubt about it, he is dead.
But his philosophy is not. He is more like a pillar supporting almost
any western philosophy of the past two and a half millenium. But he
never let his personal interest change his own philosophy (or he wouldn't
have drunk the poison and instead have flead to Macedonia ;-).
Religious figures, well, that's debatable... But, again, their
philosophies are most definitely not dead. These religions don't need
these men alive and kicking to continue to exist.
RMS on the other hand has changed his philosophy. First he preached
freedom and everything was good. Then he didn't like the way people were
using their freedom, so he took some if it away again. And _that_ is why
I think he is a has-been. Not his original philosophy of Free Software,
definitely not. But the man should stop being a blocker of his own
ideals.
RMS should let go the community that he claims to have created, that
supports and builds on his ideas and opinions. Instead, he dismisses the
people who disagree with him. Much like Newton.
(
Log in to post comments)