| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
SCO, IBM battle heats up (News.com)SCO, IBM battle heats up (News.com)Posted Nov 12, 2003 22:26 UTC (Wed) by s_cargo (guest, #10473)Parent article: SCO, IBM battle heats up (News.com) I was amused to read Stowell whining that "They [IBM] are trying to coerce and intimidate". Apparently they think that tactic is their IP also. :)
(Log in to post comments)
Stealing their valuable IP Posted Nov 13, 2003 7:39 UTC (Thu) by man_ls (subscriber, #15091) [Link] Dear sir,In the future, please precede the acronym IP with "valuable" when you are talking about SCO's. So, it should read: Apparently they think that tactic is their valuable IP also.Otherwise, you are patently trying to depreciate SCO's valuable IP and you might be served with a lawsuit. (In certain circumstances, "my preciousss" will also do.) Respectfully, Tongue In Cheek.
|
|
||||||||||||