| |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
Signed packages?Signed packages?Posted Nov 8, 2003 0:03 UTC (Sat) by liamh (subscriber, #4872)In reply to: Signed packages? by EricBackus Parent article: Time to move from Red Hat to Debian? Almost all packages are signed, though apparently policy doesn't require it yet. Check with debsums.
(Log in to post comments)
Signed packages? Posted Nov 9, 2003 6:43 UTC (Sun) by EricBackus (guest, #2816) [Link] > Almost all packages are signed, though apparently> policy doesn't require it yet. Check with debsums. OK, good. So I assume that apt-get automatically rejects (or at least *can* reject) packages that aren't signed by somebody it recognises as legitimate?
|
|||||||||||