The idea is to think about something better. Kind of obvious. That some people or GNOME developers are worried is logical. This is with every change. The middle click paste was gone in one gtk+ release, back in the next. I hated the brief period it wasn't working. But I changed the setting in gnome-tweak-tool and before I could ask about it, the setting was reverted.
Just because a few people (usually the same, though sometimes they switch accounts) here suggest that I am always "pro" whatever, it might be good to not assume things are black and white.
And if you're quoting from that thread, why not quote the response where I clearly stated that a lot of people hate the change? Is that also not a bit political to leave this out in your response to me?
Posted Sep 29, 2013 14:34 UTC (Sun) by rsidd (subscriber, #2582)
[Link]
The question here, to me, is very simple. Why design a new feature around a button that hardly exists on most new machines? On machines that have a middle button, some Linux users use it to paste. On machines (the majority today) that don't have a middle button, most users don't miss it, but a few Linux users either emulate it with simultaneous left-right, or buy an additional three-button mouse. Why not leave them alone?
And yes, this may be seen by some as flamebait, but there is another question I have: has GNOME 3 won significant numbers of new users, as opposed to users who have simply upgraded from GNOME 2 and not jumped ship? (Unity certainly has, due to Ubuntu's popularity on the desktop.)
GNOME 3.10 Released
Posted Sep 29, 2013 14:47 UTC (Sun) by hummassa (subscriber, #307)
[Link]
> The question here, to me, is very simple. Why design a new feature around a button that hardly exists on most new machines?
I just went to my favorite hardware vendor website.
Clicked "peripherals/mice"
Every single mouse for sale there had three or more buttons.
(you do know that the mouse wheel is a clickable button, don't you? you can roll up, down, or click)
GNOME 3.10 Released
Posted Sep 29, 2013 15:34 UTC (Sun) by rsidd (subscriber, #2582)
[Link]
I have news for you.
1. For many years now, laptops have outsold desktops. Today the margin isn't close.
2. Very few laptops come with three-button trackpads.
3. Very few laptop users buy mice to use with their laptops. If they are dissatisfied with the trackpad's accuracy (graphics professionals, for example) they are more likely to buy a Wacom tablet or something.
GNOME 3.10 Released
Posted Sep 29, 2013 15:47 UTC (Sun) by hummassa (subscriber, #307)
[Link]
1. yes
2. yes, more or less: at my home we have four current laptops: a MacBook, an Acer, a Sony, and a HP; the Mac has a gesture (three-finger tap), the Acer has a physical third button/"mouse wheel" (it's actually a five-way clickable joystick thingy), the Sony and the HP both have two pysical buttons, but you can click on both at the same time and get the "third button" effect.
3. actually, at the "shop", where we have some 300 laptops, I haven't ever seen one of them without an external mouse; apparently, politicians can't use the trackpads to save their lives... :-D
GNOME 3.10 Released
Posted Sep 29, 2013 21:53 UTC (Sun) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313)
[Link]
I see a very large percentage of the people who are using laptops using them as a portable desktop, i.e. they take it from one location with a keyboard/mouse/monitor to another similarly equipped.
I also see a lot of the users who use their laptops in other places pull out a 'real' mouse and plug it in.
No, it's not every laptop, but it's a rather large percentage of laptop users.
I also see laptops with the edge of their touchpad configured to act as a scroll wheel, that's a third button.
It's not nearly as uncommon to have a third button as you think.
GNOME 3.10 Released
Posted Sep 29, 2013 22:04 UTC (Sun) by khim (subscriber, #9252)
[Link]
I also see laptops with the edge of their touchpad configured to act as a scroll wheel, that's a third button.
Are you sure? I've worked with a few such models, and yes, touchpad was able to emulate scroll well (in fact you can pick if you want edge scroll or two-finger scroll), but it was not able to emulate third button. What kind of driver do you need to enable this functionality?
GNOME 3.10 Released
Posted Sep 29, 2013 22:11 UTC (Sun) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313)
[Link]
with at least a couple brands of laptops it didn't require any special driver. The system apparently saw it the same as a mouse wheel on a normal mouse. this wasn't just a matter of 'use the edge' there was actually a ridge separating the 'wheel' portion from the main portion, and tapping on the wheel portion clicked the third button.
GNOME 3.10 Released
Posted Sep 29, 2013 22:31 UTC (Sun) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link]
Any Synaptics touchpad can be configured to emulate middle-click if you click on a special zone.
GNOME 3.10 Released
Posted Oct 1, 2013 19:55 UTC (Tue) by Arker (guest, #14205)
[Link]
It's a poor but not entirely useless substitute for a real third button. It's unnecessarily hard to push it without also scrolling at the same time, however. Proper mice with three real buttons do exist but they are hard to find.
GNOME 3.10 Released
Posted Oct 1, 2013 21:06 UTC (Tue) by hummassa (subscriber, #307)
[Link]
> It's unnecessarily hard to push it without also scrolling at the same time, however
at the house we have some cheap mice, and not one of us has this complaint... the movements (clicking versus scrolling) are just too different.
GNOME 3.10 Released
Posted Oct 2, 2013 0:00 UTC (Wed) by apoelstra (subscriber, #75205)
[Link]
I've had this problem with some mice which have very small scroll increments (typically they make a clicking sound) and which compensate by only sending scroll signals to the PC every 3 or 4 clicks.
With, e.g. the Microsoft white mice I have never had this problem.
It's unfortunately an issue of stupid design rather than build quality, so you can't avoid the problem by just buying expensive mice.
GNOME 3.10 Released
Posted Sep 30, 2013 0:49 UTC (Mon) by efitton (guest, #93063)
[Link]
In essence, despite the disparaging comments and implications that the slashdot forum was wrong, GNOME designers are looking at replacing middle click paste with “something better.”
Why obfuscate? Why not just admit that designers are looking at doing just that but will make sure that tweak tool will override and this change to gtk+ won’t impact other environments. I have to imagine there would have been much less brouhaha.
And as this is only my second comment on lwn.net despite having lurked corbet’s excellent writing for a dozen years you might doubt my persona (which shouldn’t actually change the validity of my reasoning *cough*). I would be Eric Fitton the math teacher and owner of efitton.net.