Posted Sep 12, 2013 7:39 UTC (Thu) by ovitters (subscriber, #27950)
In reply to: Intel and XMir by maxiaojun
Parent article: Intel and XMir
Jeez, get your facts straight and make some sense!
GNOME is not hugely different per distribution. Self-appointed upstream? What do you mean? Obviously upstream is upstream. You make no sense at all. A default application is not the same as having a lot of patches.
GNOME OS is not meant to replace any distribution, which has been explained to you various times before.
A distribution is free to decide things for themselves. Seems you're having an issue with this?!? I don't understand your point actually.
You have an awfully short memory and tend to repeat the same statements. Does not make things true.
Posted Sep 12, 2013 20:14 UTC (Thu) by maxiaojun (subscriber, #91482)
[Link]
> GNOME is not hugely different per distribution.
How do you measure it?
> GNOME OS is not meant to replace any distribution, which has been explained to you various times before.
It shows that GNOME proper never seem to exist, every distribution has to massage GNOME to get it working.
> A distribution is free to decide things for themselves. Seems you're having an issue with this?!? I don't understand your point actually.
Yes, it is, except Canonical, troll.
Intel and XMir
Posted Sep 12, 2013 20:20 UTC (Thu) by ovitters (subscriber, #27950)
[Link]
Hahaha, you calling me a troll. Jeez! Anyway, you conveniently again didn't say anything of value, yet again for the x'th amount of time on LWN. Good luck!
