Re: Bug#718791: ITP: mikutter -- Simple, powerful and moeful twitter client

On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 01:54 +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 04:56:51PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 12:46 +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:59:29AM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:35:01PM +0900, HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai) wrote:
> > > > > Package: wnpp
> > > > > Severity: wishlist
> > > > > Owner: "HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai)" <dai@debian.org>
> > > > > 
> > > > > * Package name    : mikutter
> > > > >   Version         : 0.2.2.1318
> > > > >   Upstream Author : Toshiaki Asai
> > > > > * URL             : http://mikutter.hachune.net/
> > > > > * License         : GPL-3, CC-BY-SA-3.0
> > > > >   Programming Lang: Ruby
> > > > >   Description     : Simple, powerful and moeful twitter client
> > > >                                            ^^^^^^
> > > > 
> > > > >  Mikutter is a simple, powerful and moeful twitter client.
> > > >                                       ^^^^^^
> > > > 
> > > > I can't find any definition of "moeful" and therefore is more of a
> > > > hindrance to understanding the description than an aid.
> > > 
> > > Probably a conjugation of "moe" and "-ful". Just "moe" would probably better
> > > describe this.
> > 
> > I've never seen such a word in English.  I don't *think* either
> > definition at <http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=moe>
> > fits...
> 
> Well, "mikutter" and its URL are references to Hatsune Miku[1], and its homepage
> even features her in a cutesy pose, so the first definition on urbandictionary
> could definitely fit, though the Wikipedia entry[2] gives a more detailed and
> accurate description of the term.
> 
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatsune_Miku
> [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moe_(slang)

This may be obvious to the average otaku, but not so much to
$debian_user who is trying to choose between the many Twitter clients we
have.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
This sentence contradicts itself - no actually it doesn't.