LWN.net Logo

The "fair" phone

By Jake Edge
July 31, 2013

Amidst all the hubbub surrounding the Ubuntu Edge crowdfunding effort, we came across another, similar effort that merits a look: the Fairphone. Its vision is different than Canonical's convergence concept, but it is also using crowdfunding to jumpstart production. Fairphone is more than just technology, however, as the company seeks to redefine the economics and supply chains of phones (and other electronics) with the goals of more transparency and ... well ... fairness.

The goals are ambitious, but one milestone has already been met. The crowdfunding target of 5,000 phones (at €325) was easily met in June, three weeks into its month-long campaign. Over 10,000 were eventually sold. The money raised has allowed the non-profit to build 20,000 phones, so there are still phones available—at the original price. The phones are only available in Europe, at least currently, though there are hints that other regions will be added eventually. The delivery date is expected to be in October.

For phone hardware, the first Fairphone model is solid, but not spectacular: a quad-core 1.2 GHz ARM processor running a customized Android 4.2 with 1G of RAM, 16G of storage, 4.3" display (960x540), dual SIM slots, removable battery, 8 and 1.3 megapixel cameras, the usual array of sensors, and so on. No chargers or headphones are included and the phone is said to use "minimal packaging". Both of those are in keeping with the low-impact mission of Fairphone.

The company got its start in 2010 as a research project of several Dutch non-profit organizations to gather information and raise awareness of the conflicts and wars fueled by the extraction of minerals used in consumer electronics. That research, which focused on minerals from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, took three years. The phone project came about in 2013 with the "aim of designing, creating and producing our first smartphone and taking the next crucial step in uncovering the story behind the sourcing, production, distribution and recycling of electronics", according to the company web site.

So Fairphone wants to produce a long-lasting phone (to reduce waste) that is made from "conflict-free" minerals, mined by workers who are paid a fair wage. In fact, the goal is that all of the workers in the supply chain are paid a fair wage and work under reasonable conditions (both from a safety and environmental protection standpoint). The company is also conscious of reducing e-waste; recycling and reusing any materials that can be. "Our end goal is fewer phones in circulation – not more".

Obviously, those are some ambitious goals—overly ambitious, some would say. But they are worthwhile goals. Anything that can be learned from pursuing them will be valuable information that can be used by other device makers. This is an area where Fairphone clearly shines, as transparency is yet another goal of the project. That leads to blog posts detailing the production process, including sourcing conflict-free tin paste and tantalum capacitors, packaging issues, and more. In fact, the blog has a wealth of information about various facets of Fairphone, its mission, and its progress.

Transparency is not limited to the production process. Pricing, and how €325 was arrived at, are part of what Fairphone will be disclosing. The design of the phone is open as well. As might be guessed for a company whose manifesto is "if you can't open it, you don't own it", the phone is rootable and the OS is easily replaceable. There is mention of both Ubuntu Touch and Firefox OS as possible replacements—CyanogenMod seems like it should be a slam dunk.

Like many of the goals, the transparency goals have not been completely met. More information is pending on pricing, for example, and the list of suppliers [PDF] is incomplete, but the intentions seem good. Given that it all started as a research project, which morphed into an actual product, it may take some time to fully realize all of the goals.

In fact, full realization of the goals of the project are probably many years away, if ever. Not all of the components will be "conflict free", for example, at least in the first model. As described in a ZDNet article, the company is running into many of the same issues that other phone and device-makers have hit—it's simply not easy to change the parts that go into a device. But, that doesn't mean that it isn't worth trying.

From a cost perspective, the Fairphone seems fairly reasonable. Many smartphones are substantially more expensive. The extra effort in making a cleaner and more fair device seems to come almost for free. It's a bit hard to see major phone makers switching to conflict-free tin paste (or fair pay throughout the supply chain) any time soon, as it might impact the all-important bottom line. Over time, though, efforts like Fairphone may help bring the costs down to a level where the "big boys" will start using them. It may also raise consumer awareness to a point where there is demand for devices of this nature. Either outcome would certainly be a step in the right direction.


(Log in to post comments)

Uh huh

Posted Aug 1, 2013 4:47 UTC (Thu) by jmorris42 (subscriber, #2203) [Link]

All this bloviating about morals and.... yup! Made in the People's Republic of China. Ok, I understand making electronics outside of Asia is hard, if for no other reason than supply chain length. It took a lot of effort and a little luck for the Pi folks to find a UK factory they could use. No manufacturing capacity in Taiwan, South Korea or Japan anymore? Really? Apple is about as hippie, 'we care' as a corporation can get and they can't avoid stories about their Chinese factories popping up in the news.

Or do they simply not have a 'moral' (read political) problem doing deals with Communists?

Uh huh

Posted Aug 1, 2013 9:09 UTC (Thu) by ahuillet (subscriber, #40848) [Link]

Communism isn't the problem in this case. It's forced labor and human rights issues. You can find that in non-communist regimes.
That said - your comment is quite right.

Uh huh

Posted Aug 1, 2013 13:11 UTC (Thu) by drag (subscriber, #31333) [Link]

But, hey, China can't hold a candle to the USA in terms of the amount of their own population in prison.

They could of made the Fairphone in Europe, but then it probably would be a 700 euro phone and not a 300 euro phone.

Uh huh

Posted Aug 1, 2013 9:10 UTC (Thu) by andrey.turkin (subscriber, #89915) [Link]

> Or do they simply not have a 'moral' (read political) problem doing deals with Communists?

Communism is not a bad idea, actually. When done right. China's regime doesn't look right to me but it is not because of communism ideology.

That said, I agree that their stated goals ("conflict-free" minerals and good wage/conditions for all the workers who contributed to producing required supplies) are far-fetched. How could they track down every single raw material what went to producing subcomponents? How could they check that all the workers who produced these materials were treated fairly?

It is an impressive project though (I am particularly impressed they managed to struck deal with MediaTek for just 5k units of SoC; in my experience major chip manufactures don't want to talk to you unless you want to buy tens or hundreds of thousands of units). Too bad they'll only ship to Europe.

Mediatek...

Posted Aug 1, 2013 12:36 UTC (Thu) by rsidd (subscriber, #2582) [Link]

I had a phone with a Mediatek chipset, and it was pretty crummy (it was from a budget manufacturer). Less than a year later I got a cheaper and better Samsung phone, which has worked reliably for several months now. I hope the Fairphone is careful about quality.

Uh huh

Posted Aug 1, 2013 16:35 UTC (Thu) by drag (subscriber, #31333) [Link]

> Communism is not a bad idea, actually.

In it's pure form communism is a lovely idea, but founded on just blatantly wrong theories about economics (ie: labor theory of value) and provides no practical mechanism for managing economies. There is simply no information feedback mechanism available for communist society to be able to accurately guide any sort of economic effort and this is a fundamental and mortal flaw to the concept. It can't be worked around and still have anything resembling communism/marxism.

But, yeah, China is definitely no long anything resembling communism. If they tried to be purely communist they wouldn't have the capabilities to feed their populations. They are a variation of fascism now, were government and business are deeply intertwined and different economic interests are represented by committees in government. Same thing were the USA has been heading for a long time now, China is just ahead of the curve in this regard.

Uh huh

Posted Aug 2, 2013 1:45 UTC (Fri) by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389) [Link]

> China is just ahead of the curve in this regard.

Shh! If the politicians hear that, they'll want to charge full steam ahead!

Uh huh

Posted Aug 6, 2013 17:11 UTC (Tue) by tstover (subscriber, #56283) [Link]

> Communism is not a bad idea, actually.

ok I'll get trolled in...

What I find genuinely sad is the naivety and ignorance of what the word communism means. The banner of communism is responsible for more human suffering, death, barbarism, and horror than any other force in human history. Linux & F/OSS is an example of what free people can do. You can't point a gun a someone and force them to write code the same way you can put them knee deep in a rice field. Maybe the stupid white kids at over-privileged-U think talk like that is "interesting" when your all getting high together, but in the international context of the F/OSS scene you might come across some people who themselves are survivors. Believe me, if you ever get the privilege of meeting one, they will no doubt shatter your make believe reality.

Uh huh

Posted Aug 7, 2013 7:37 UTC (Wed) by jezuch (subscriber, #52988) [Link]

> What I find genuinely sad is the naivety and ignorance of what the word communism means. The banner of communism is responsible for more human suffering, death, barbarism, and horror than any other force in human history.

You're talking about the implementation of Communism. They're talking about the theory of Communism. They are very, very different things. And you should listen to me because I lived for less than 9 years in a Communist country (until it was abolished here) ;)

Uh huh

Posted Aug 19, 2013 17:04 UTC (Mon) by nim-nim (subscriber, #34454) [Link]

What hyperbole…

Christianity alone resulted in more horrors, from religious wars to crusades to witch hunts to the colonization of the Americas (if it managed to kill less that's only because thee were less people to kill at the time). Don't judge ideas by the acts of people who cloak themselves in some symbols.

Uh huh

Posted Aug 1, 2013 9:53 UTC (Thu) by mpr22 (subscriber, #60784) [Link]

The PRC might have been communist in the strict sense under Mao, but it certainly isn't now. It's state capitalist, combining state ownership of large-scale industry with private ownership of small-scale industry. I agree, though, that there are legitimate concerns about the "fairness" of something being manufactured in the PRC (both from a labour-relations standpoint and from the general "it is an authoritarian single-party state" standpoint).

Uh huh

Posted Aug 1, 2013 10:05 UTC (Thu) by jwakely (subscriber, #60262) [Link]

> Or do they simply not have a 'moral' (read political) problem doing deals with Communists?

The implication being that they're a bunch of pinko commies themselves? This is hardly the first time you feel the need to comment about commies. Are you from the 1950s?

The PRC can sort itself out (or not), but the DRC is a warzone, with people and endangered species dying in conflict over mineral-rich land. If I can get a phone that even *tries* to avoid some of the worst problems there, then that's an improvement on the alternatives on the market, no?

Uh huh

Posted Aug 1, 2013 11:59 UTC (Thu) by NAR (subscriber, #1313) [Link]

I believe they are doing business with individual companies, not governments.

Uh huh

Posted Aug 2, 2013 16:54 UTC (Fri) by paulj (subscriber, #341) [Link]

China is as communist as the USA is. Indeed, China today is perhaps even *more* the epitome of a hyper-capitalist state (with little effective regulation, less than the USA, and the same parasitic classes in politics and law making the system to suit cronies, skimming the system). China today makes the US look socialist!

Anyway, this is completely off-topic to the article. Try keep your political biases to yourself, when the article is not about politics.

Uh huh

Posted Aug 9, 2013 1:38 UTC (Fri) by lysse (guest, #3190) [Link]

But the UK is currently governed by people who are determined to inflict forced, indefinite, unpaid labour upon even people who are generally agreed to be too ill to be required to look for paid work, and who want to tear up our membership of the ECHR because a couple of court cases haven't gone their way. Oh, and who have decided that making a joke about rioting on Facebook can get you sent to prison for four years.

Tell me again what the big moral objection is to Communists, when capitalists behave THIS badly?

Uh huh

Posted Aug 9, 2013 8:51 UTC (Fri) by jezuch (subscriber, #52988) [Link]

> Tell me again what the big moral objection is to Communists, when capitalists behave THIS badly?

Well, Communism was a response to capitalists behaving THIS badly, after all...

fair phone, fair sources?

Posted Aug 2, 2013 5:54 UTC (Fri) by nhippi (subscriber, #34640) [Link]

fairphone uses mediatek cpu with powervr gpu. Neither which has been engaging with Open Source community in any way. No public documentation. Some GPL kernel sources have been leaked, userspace side of hardware adaption is probably totally closed. This serious setback for anyone who wants to install an alternative OS to the phone.

Fairphone is rather antithetical to for example what openmoko tried to do (source open source friendly components), or what replicant is working on (replace closed bits with open ones).

The "fair" phone

Posted Aug 4, 2013 18:23 UTC (Sun) by ssam (subscriber, #46587) [Link]

Its great to see a bunch of small companies take on the smart phone. I think its a much harder market to get into than the early PC market. If you can't reach 10k units then you get terrible prices. If you don't have the latest specs in a small enough body you will get mocked. And you are up against giants who have subsidy deals with the carriers.

I hope at least a few of them succeed.

Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds